The photos need to include the date for proper identification.
The distanc of the mintmark from the date is one of the biggest parts of telling which die you have. Your images are cropped too closely for identification.
The first one, (1956?) , could be the -001, BUT without having the full date and MM in view, it is impossiblwe to be sure. There is TOO mannt poooibilities for the MM placement to be certain, with only the view shown. The same applies to the second, although I found anything close, in a search on the site. Aas Chuck said you need a full dat& MM to be able to identify. Dick
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use