Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsSpecializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Interesting Die Gouge On The Reverse Of This 21-P Morgan

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 3,641Next Topic
Page: of 2
Valued Member
United States
194 Posts
 Posted 04/28/2015  2:41 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GoldenIslesCoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
the 1921 morgans are hard to find as there are so many. Best of luck to you
Pillar of the Community
Chancellor Sutler's Avatar
United States
1372 Posts
 Posted 04/28/2015  3:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Chancellor Sutler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Indeed, there is an exhaustive list of VAMs for 1921. I can only study these until my eyes cross, then I have to stop.

Chance
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 04/28/2015  6:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have to think this through for a bit. Chancellor, go look at my thread here:

https://goccf.com/t/226879

Yours is the second coin I've seen, ever, showing that anomaly, and I'm on the road to figuring it out theoretically now. But I need more noodling time.

You just broke open a problem that's been nagging me for years.
Pillar of the Community
Chancellor Sutler's Avatar
United States
1372 Posts
 Posted 04/28/2015  6:35 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Chancellor Sutler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
There's a certified 21-S on ebay right now that's been suggested is an adjustment strike. It's a bit more pronounced than this Denver issue, but the lightness of strike is over the entire coin, obverse and reverse.

Here's a link to that listing:

http://www.ebay.com/itm/1921-S-MORG...em4ae90cab51

Chance
Edited by Chancellor Sutler
04/28/2015 6:42 pm
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 04/28/2015  7:03 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't necessarily think these are adjustment strikes. At least, maybe not deliberate ones. Either way, not relevant to where I'm going. The San Fran coin is mere percentage points below the crud one sees from them in 1921.

Barely enough pressure to strike it....when you have to strike as many Majors as you're used to striking Dimes, you make sure the equipment lasts....
Moderator
Learn More...
SsuperDdave's Avatar
United States
23522 Posts
 Posted 04/29/2015  07:52 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add SsuperDdave to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sorry for the overnight wait - I wanted to forget about it for a bit and revisit my thinking fresh. What follows is the numismatic equivalent of wide-eyed speculation, and probably shouldn't be taken as Gospel.

Whether or not yours is an adjustment strike isn't relevant here. Methinks is probably is, but the Mint turned out some truly execrable product in 1921 and one must always factor the pressure to produce at such a high rate into these things.

The important thing I glean from your coin is a pretty good hint about the order in which die devices fill during a strike. As you know, the planchet metal adopts liquid properties during a strike. Metal actually flows, on order to fill the areas of varying volume disproportional to the amount of planchet metal available at that exact spot. This is how flow lines come to be, and we know it to be in a generally center-outward direction. That's why dies were basined, ground into a slightly concave configuration to help metal completely fill the periphery of the die.

Now for the wild-eyed part. During the strike, planchet metal flows into peripheral lettering at a pretty high rate of speed (at 150 strikes per minute, the coin has 0.4sec to be inserted, struck and ejected) and splashes against the first thing that impedes its' progress - the spots inside the letter which meet its' progress at a 90-degree angle. That's why the ridges we see are on "horizontals" on the sides of the letter away from the center. Then it begins splashing back into the deepest part of the letter and fills the letter upwards In an adjustment strike - or by definition any strike with "sufficiently insufficient" pressure - that initial splash and a partial letter fill is all that happens. It can't finish.

That same thing happened to both of our coins. Yours was caused by pressure insufficient to even fill the letters, possibly along with poor basining. Mine was caused by what I'm theorizing to be a slightly-compressible strikethrough/fill which slowed the process sufficiently or stopped it completely.
Pillar of the Community
Chancellor Sutler's Avatar
United States
1372 Posts
 Posted 04/29/2015  12:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Chancellor Sutler to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Sounds feasible enough to me. I looked around a bit, and the 3rd party graders don't assign numerical grades to "adjustment strikes". It would be difficult to do it, presumably because the flow lines that create mint luster, would not be fully manifested. As crappy as mine looks, it may indeed be very close to UNC. there are a good many contact marks though, so I think it spent some time in some pockets.

You mentioned feed finger troubles earlier in this thread. I noticed a phenomena while looking at my (mostly later date ... post 1934) BU Mercury dimes. It's most prevalent on San Francisco minted coins, but can appear on any of them. There are 2 places on the obverse of the coins that are very slightly faceted and polished at the edges ... around 4:30 and 7:30 ... or below the motto, and slightly to the right of the date. These "spots" are highly polished and look as bright as a proof, but looking at these areas with a loupe, there are polishing lines present. Its as if the dies were damaged in those areas repeatedly and they had to be ground and polished in those areas. Some of them are noticeably faceted in those areas.

I'll bet I have a half a dozen or more examples of this phenomena in my set. Another area for this polishing to be present is right at her hairline, adjacent to her forehead, which is where clash marks from the reverse first manifest themselves, so I'm pretty sure that something was damaging the dies in those 2 areas near the bottom edge of the coin, requiring that the dies be ground and polished....maybe feed fingers?

Chance
  Previous TopicReplies: 22 / Views: 3,641Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.27 seconds to rattle this change. Forums