| Author |
Replies: 76 / Views: 10,328 |
|
Valued Member
United States
430 Posts |
What would a 105mm enlarging lens(instead of a 75mm lens) do on the end of a bellows? Too close for pennies? Need a bigger copy stand? Why is 75mm the sweet spot?
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
specifically this is the lens I am talking about. "Schneider Xenar 105mm f4.5 lens #4823282. The subject field of view for a full-frame 35mm image with this lens and the bellows at full extension is 1-1/2" x 1". The distance from the front of the lens to the subject is approximately 8-1/2"." the lens comes with the bellows.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
Await further opinion, but I cannot imagine a 105mm lens meeting those figures. I was unable to put something as large as a Morgan completely into the field of view with a 105 (also a Schneider but that's not relevant) given at least 15" of distance from lens front to coin, with the bellows cranked closed as tightly as I could get it. It's all I can do to achieve that with a 75mm.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
75mm is about as short as you can go to achieve low enough magnification on typical bellows to frame a Dollar using an APS-C camera. This also means it keeps the setup as small as possible while framing the dollar. Any shorter and you can't frame a Dollar. Any longer and the setup gets bigger to frame the Dollar.
The specific magnification you're talking about is slightly below 1:1 (1-1/2" x 1" is 37.5mm x 25mm) on FF sensor. It's actually 24/25 = 0.96:1, close enough to 1:1 that we can just use it for the calculations. At 1:1, distance from center of lens to sensor is equal to distance from center of lens to the coin, and both are equal to twice the focal length. So for a 105mm lens, this should be 210mm, or 8-1/4". The 8-1/2" they quote is probably due to it not being quite 1:1. So at least the numbers do make sense.
On FF sensor, you will need to have a bit higher magnification since Cents are 19mm diameter. I usually figure on 1.2:1 for Cents on FF, so you will need about 10% longer bellows extension to frame a Cent properly. You will need 15% longer to frame a Dime. Dollars are 38mm, so require a magnification of around 0.6:1, requiring 20% shorter extension.
Remember that the total extension includes the camera register, which is about 44mm for Canon, plus any adapters, as well as the bellows minimum extension.
It's interesting to note that FF sensors actually make these tradeoffs easier, because they require higher magnification (typically 1.6x) to fill the sensor. This means that 75mm is not the "sweet spot" for FF sensor cameras. Typical bellows are around 44mm minimum extension. Adapters add perhaps 15mm, and the register is 44mm, so minimum extension is approx 103mm. This gives a minimum magnification of (103-75)/75= 0.37:1, which can frame a Dollar with a little space around it on APS-C, but only fills 59% of the sensor on FF. The equivalent focal length for FF is 64mm. So even on FF you can't use a 50mm (or even 63mm) lens on bellows for Dollars. I don't know of any commercial bellows lenses between 64mm and 75mm, so 75mm is still likely the best choice, even for FF.
All that said, I have built several setups where 75mm was not long enough to frame a Dollar due to either the bellows being a bit longer minimum length (like Canon Auto Bellows), requirement for more adapters, or using a Nikon camera, which have longer register distance. In these cases I resorted to using an 80mm lens instead, and all worked out, but each combination of bellows, adapters, camera, and available stand height has to be checked individually to see if it can meet a full-range requirement.
Edited by rmpsrpms 05/02/2015 7:51 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
Ray, what an amazing detailed answer. Let me see if I can digest a major point. If I was to use 3 different lenses 60mm, 75mm, and 105mm lenses mounted on a bellows with a camera with an APS-C sensor. With these set ups the 60 mm lens would barely fit a Morgan dollar with the bellows contracted all the way. the 75 mm would be ok but the front of the lens will need to farther from the coin. The issue with the 105mm lens is you need a very large copy stand to get the front of the lens far enough away from the coin. Right? So now the real reason for the post. I have already bought a f4 75mm omega lens. The bellows on ebay I'm looking at is a Novoflex dual track. It has a canon mount already attached, and a 105mm lens on the front. So will the 105 be useful or a throw away for coin photos? Glossary check .... Camera register - the distance inside the camera from the sensor to the front where the lens attaches.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23522 Posts |
You'll find the 105 useful - depending on its' quality, of course - but the size of coin you can image will be limited. Wouldn't hurt a bit to play with it and see what it can do.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Wizzy...the 60mm will not quite fit a Dollar on FF, and will far from fit it on APS-C, with typical bellows and adapters. 75mm will easily fit on FF but barely fit on APS-C, while 105mm is extremely long on FF and very long on APS-C. Are you using APS-C or FF camera? I will give you some advice, since you have options, though they may seem counter-intuitive...use the 105mm for smaller coins, and the 75mm for larger ones. This will keep a closer working distance between them.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
Ok. I bought some stuff already. APS-C camera canon rebel XS and this bellows lens combo http://www.ebay.com/itm/Novoflex-du...em3f4b9c5f7fand a $15 Omega 75mm f/3.5 El-Omegar Enlarging Lens. I have a very jury rigged stand that I'm not sure is sturdy enough, that's why I'm looking for a microscope stand. So I will have both a 105mm and a 75 mm lens.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
Here is my stand a small $20 stand with a focusing rail attached. It was unsteady so I attached a diagonal strut which bolstered things side to side. Front to back it was only steady with the rail all the way down. Today I added the suction cup dashboard attachment I had lying around and now its much better. But going up in magnification may be a problem  
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Clever stand. It doesn't have fine focus ability, but the bellows you bought does and may be all you need.
Now, the bellows is a native Exacta mount, so requires adapters both ends to be useful. Luckily it comes with the required adapters (the EXLEI converts Exacta to 39mm Leica mount) so you are technically set, but those adapters add a lot of extra extension. It's not clear if the bellows will have short enough minimum extension to work with Dollars using the 75mm lens. You may end up using the 105mm for everything. That's not a bad thing, because the Schneider Xenar 105mm bellows lens is excellent, and is worth the price of the whole auction and then some. In fact if you ever decide to sell it, I will buy it or trade with you.
Even if the 75mm can't frame a Dollar, you may still want to use it for higher mag shots than the 105 can do, if that's of interest.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
Well... I received my stuff yesterday and today. Canon XS body, EL Omegar 75mm f3.5 lens, and a old german bellows(Novoflex) with a 105mm f 4.5 Xenar enlarging lens. I guess I'm the poster child for letting Ray build it for you. The problem is the bellows. As Ray said earlier it is a Exacta mount. As I am now learning this really old school stuff from the old DDR (east germany). Getting parts for Exacta gear is darn near impossible or expensive. But I bought this because it had the enlarging lens attached and came with a canon mount.So I thought I could swap out the 105mm lens for the 75mm one when I was going to photograph smaller and larger coins. So the bellows arrives and the lens is a 32.5mm x 0.5 thread so no go on the 75mm lens. I have searched all over looking for a 32.5 to 39mm adapter. the only one I could find was in Moscow. I can find a 32.5mm to 37mm adapter though. I don't want an endless stack of adapters either. I'm open to any suggestions for a work around for this. As for the other end of the bellows the canon mount is a canon FD mount not an EOS. So no go there either. I have ordered a FD to EOS adapter (one without glass) so that is another week. So the lesson is don't try to forge an new path when the old one has been paved, lined, and graded.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
I ordered an M42 to M39 adapter from Russia a while back and never received it. I did get a full refund but had to wait 4 weeks due to the estimated delivery time. It's too bad because it was a nice (looking) robust adapter but the helicoil style works just fine.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
The FD adapter is easy but it adds significant length. In the end you'll be glad you have the 105mm!
Thing that bothers me is the listing states the adapter is an "EXLEI". In Novoflex terminology, this means it adapts from Exacta camera to Leica lens. If it said "LEIEX" it would adapt from Leica camera to Exacta lens. Anyway, point is that the Leica lens side of the adapter should be M39, NOT M32.5. I suspect there may be a helicoil or some other adapter stuck to the EXLEI adapter, making it look like M32.5. I don't believe Leica ever did anything in M32.5, and Novoflex certainly would not call it LEI.
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
Edited by rmpsrpms 05/07/2015 5:44 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
I'll take photos tonight and show you. if there is another ring in there its REAL tight.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4038 Posts |
Did you determine if there is an adapter attached to the EXLEI?
Contact me for photographic equipment or visit my home page at: http://macrocoins.com
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
430 Posts |
My photos don't help but it is all one piece. What I have seen by searching ebay is there is an adapter called EXLEI K which I think is the adapter I would need to connect a 39M thread. Maybe there is a vintage leica thread that is 32.5mm x 0.5? In any case I ordered a canon FD to EOS adapter and also Canon FD to Nikon F adapter since I also have Nikon gear. The Nikon adapter arrived today so I was able to finally see what bellows macro stuff is all about. I took a few snaps of cents I will try some big coins later today. Should I continue this thread with my pictures or start a new thread?
|
| |
Replies: 76 / Views: 10,328 |