| Author |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,220 |
|
Valued Member
United States
278 Posts |
Just came in the mail today. Photo taken through the flip. Give me your thoughts on surface and grade. Thanks.  
|
|
|
|
New Member
United States
5 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
What is that above of america?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16677 Posts |
Appears as if it's been dipped unfortunately.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18645 Posts |
Looks like a clash above and also to the right of the E in ONE
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
278 Posts |
Quote: What is that above of america? That's a obverse lamination. And there's a reverse die clash from the feather tips as well. Quote: Appears as if it's been dipped unfortunately. This is my concern. It looks beautiful in hand, but I'm just alittle... I mean the color just doesn't look quite right. I didn't know if it was paranoia or not.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16677 Posts |
The obverse, if that pic is true in hand, lacks original luster..yours is flat and micro-grainy. Those are my main concerns.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
I disagree with dipped. It has luster, not shine. Plus that micro-grainy texture is just from a VLDS.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
278 Posts |
Quote: The obverse, if that pic is true in hand, lacks original luster..yours is flat and micro-grainy. Those are my main concerns. I think it's my photo technique that knocks down the luster alot of times. The luster is there, I'm concerned with the ever so slight pink hue. I've seen others this colored that have been graded and slabbed no problem. I just don't know really. Quote: I disagree with dipped. It has luster, not shine. Plus that micro-grainy texture is just from a VLDS. Yes SilverStackerKid, it definitely has luster!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
The luster shows better on the reverse. That was my first concern, the obverse looked a bit blah.
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10456 Posts |
The die clash is cool...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16677 Posts |
My personal experience with IHC's and with RD and RB coins is that pink hue, in hand, is a sign the coin has been altered in some way. Since I don't have the coin in hand, you'd know better. But like Ed, I'm seeing more luster and an almost more natural look on the reverse. Having said that, if this is the exact look of the coin in hand, I can almost bet any TPG will problem label it.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
My first thought when I saw your photo of obverse was it looks like it was sand blasted with corn starch.  But the reverse has the original color and luster to make it a decent coin. MS-62 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
278 Posts |
Quote:Having said that, if this is the exact look of the coin in hand, I can almost bet any TPG will problem label it. I tend to agree with you. This is my delima, because I actually really like this coin. If I could say 100% that it was not altered, then I picked it up for a steal. If it's been altered, then I overpaid market value... but it still has some nice eye appeal and features. Quote: My first thought when I saw your photo of obverse was it looks like it was sand blasted with corn starch. I actually like this look... the vlds just looks cool under glass to me. Not all, but this one. Quote: The die clash is cool... My favorite part about this IHC and why I'm struggling to keep it or not.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
I think it would make AU. I am seeing a lot of wear on the tips of the feathers.
|
| |
Replies: 19 / Views: 2,220 |