I am convinced by Sander's idea. The excess / remaining metal is not likely a part of number 3. And we can't see other remaining parts of number 3 around number 5 which is usually the case of overdate.
It is reported on Krause catalogue that there is 1925/3 but I have never seen an actual photo. If Krause refer to such coin like this, maybe they are wrong.
It is reported on Krause catalogue that there is 1925/3 but I have never seen an actual photo. If Krause refer to such coin like this, maybe they are wrong.






















