I agree with Lucky Cuss ... The markings are correct (oMF) for the 1614, but it looks strange to me. Mainly because it 'just so happens', to have year, mint markings and denomination so clearly visable. It could happen, but ... Well it's a big 'but' :) Nontheless, I kind of like it as a pendant :)
Agreed. There appears to be extra metal deposited over certain devices. Some might argue that is due to corrosion in sea water, but that's not what this looks like to me. I suspect it is some form of reproduction made for the use as jewelry. As Dagaz mentioned, it seems well suited for use as a pendant.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use