| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,568 |
|
Valued Member
United States
101 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Need better pics but it looks like MD. It is not the famous 1969-S doubled die. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
Ok ill try and take more now hard to get right lighting on phone but ill do it
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 To CCF , Your photos need to be more sharper to evaluate.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
  Not the big one, but keep looking. As John notes there is some evidence of MD, but otherwise, not worth more than a penny. You may want to check out the Photography forum for tips on taking pictures. My quick tutorial: I find it useful to find a larger, heavy object that has the approximate focal length for zooming into a clear picture. Hold the phone to that and it'll steady your shot. Play with lighting to get your affect. And if your phone has editing options, crop the photo before uploading it to your computer. Once there you can edit the photo using your standard editor or use the Image Optimization tool here to enhance your picture. Use contrast to sharpen your details. Good luck!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4809 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1228 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
101 Posts |
This was what I read in detail and read about the die marks and where they are at on the coin found so when I looked on this coin I have every die mark they call out on this coin they speak of the coin is old but I refered to this can you tell me if this information is is correct on this link>>>? http://doubleddie.com/314201.html
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
If the variety is not on the coin, the matching markers mean nothing. The dies go over the same events over and over many times. So some die markers can happen on any die, But the small things like die scratches maybe present on some of the run of coins struck with a die. I mentioned "some" because die markers may come and go. Some of the coins are struck before die scratches maybe present. Some are only partially there because they flattened. But hub doubling should be easily seen in order for it to be collectable with powers up to 10X. Most collectors desire these. But even with the small images you posted, the big doubled die should easy have been in them if it is that die. Example:  We should see the doubling in your images even with the smaller images you provided. We mentioned "MD" or called Machine Doubling, (I prefer machine damage as nothing is doubled about the event, just reduced/damaged devices in those areas) this is called from a normal die that experienced a bit of die movement during the strike. This damages the devices making them look larger as some may think. But the devices are normal sized and part of the devices are reduced in size. Example:   You can see the normal devices on the bottom part of the coin near the fields. But note the upper part is affected by the die damaging the upper part of the devices. The happened a lot on the 1968-1972 cents. So because of the big doubled die for that year, the 1969-s cents are looked at a lot. Machine damage (doubling is common and to me is of no worth. To me it is a damaged coin. Machine damage can happen on doubled dies as well.  Note lower image's arrows. A doubled die is called that as the hub that shapped the die was not aligned correctly during the creation process. Thus the doubling is on the die. Thus the term doubled die. On MD the die is normal and the strike was the cause of the damage to that coins devices. Hope this helps.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1781 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,568 |