| Author |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,209 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
731 Posts |
Common date but a nice BU to me. What do you think?  
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
226 Posts |
I'm thinking a MS-61. Maybe higher if there is more luster in hand, looks a little dull in the picks (maybe from a cleaning or something)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1788 Posts |
MS60? Can't tell from scans.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
77 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
There is wear on Liberty's breast and knee. That should keep it out of the MS category completely.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
940 Posts |
I think the TPGs typically overlook light rub on the high points of double eagles, and they likely would grade this MS-61.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
731 Posts |
Thanks everyone for all the input
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7618 Posts |
wouldnt be surprised to see it go 63. They are very liberal on gold sometimes.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6478 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
177 Posts |
I think there are too many dings and stuff for either MS-63 or AU-58, depending on how a TPG measures the rub. If the rub doesn't count ("slider"), MS-62, but if it counts as wear, then AU-55
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
919 Posts |
I would say AU55 or 58. The eagle seems to have wear on breast area. Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36741 Posts |
I don't see any wear, just allot of tics. MS-61 maybe 62.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I'll go with 61. Those are some pretty big hits on the reverse.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1002 Posts |
Classic. AU 55-58 
|
| |
Replies: 17 / Views: 2,209 |