| Author |
Replies: 8 / Views: 2,030 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
84 Posts |
Looks like a D, but also a sideways S? *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
624 Posts |
It looks like a D that has either been damaged or maybe a cracked die during mintage? S mint marks wouldn't be sideways. It's carved into the die so there would be no way for it to twist when the coin was made.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
D with damage. MM were hand punched on working dies so it could be punched on the die in different locations and rotated. John1 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
84 Posts |
That is excellent info, guys, thanks so much !
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36498 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
9792 Posts |
Denver for sure, could be damage or possibly a lamination error or planchet flaw.
"Buy the Book Before You Buy the Coin" - Aaron R. Feldman - "And read it" - Me 2013! ANA Life Member #3288 in good standing since 1981, ANS, Early American Coppers Member (EAC), Colonial Coin Collectors Club member (C4), Conder Token Collector Club member (CTCC), Civil War Token Society (CWTS) member, Liberty Seated Collectors Club (LSCC) & Numismatic Bibliomania Society member (NBS), USMex, Member in good standing, 2¢ variety collector. See my want page: http://goccf.com/t/140440
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1132 Posts |
Definitely an interesting MM. Also definitely D.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7390 Posts |
Quote: t's carved into the die so there would be no way for it to twist when the coin was made. Atually, up until the late 1980s mint marks were hand- punched into the die. Could a sideways s have been punched in, sure, but I've never seen one. I agree that this looks like a hard hit or lamination but still a cool looking "flying" D nonetheless
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1228 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 8 / Views: 2,030 |
|