Posted 10/16/2015 11:18 pm
Even with Newcomb and Grellman at hand the coin and its die state make attribution difficult (not like 1851 was easy to begin with)
I keep coming back to N-24 and N-27 (R3 and R5 respectively) but without the coin in hand to look for the die lines it is difficult...might be completely off base on those guesses, though.
1851 even confused Newcomb, as Grellman noted in the 2005 Reiver sale (N-24, N-27, N-32 all mixed up, and N-32 later delisted)
I keep coming back to N-24 and N-27 (R3 and R5 respectively) but without the coin in hand to look for the die lines it is difficult...might be completely off base on those guesses, though.
1851 even confused Newcomb, as Grellman noted in the 2005 Reiver sale (N-24, N-27, N-32 all mixed up, and N-32 later delisted)
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890
"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
