| Author |
Replies: 38 / Views: 8,193 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Quote: Being an expert when it comes to counterfeit coins, these all look perfectly fine to me. And what qualifies you as an expert?  The 1798 large cent and the 1803 Half Cent have been proven counterfeit, and it is likely some/many/all of the others in this group are counterfeit. I can't see the minute signs of counterfeiting from the photos supplied, but in hand I might be able to find the depressions and toolmarks indicative of the higher-quality counterfeits. The best counterfeits are NOT the ones made in China and sold on the no-no site. Being able to consistently detect the US, European, and Middle Eastern counterfeits is a true qualifier of an expert.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
It may not have come from that site but you're mistaken if you don't think the best ones come from the Far East.
Edited by basebal21 12/17/2015 11:59 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I believe all of the coins in this thread, counterfeit or not, are of US origin. Look up "Bay Area" counterfeits and see what I mean. These were produced around San Fransisco. Most counterfeit gold is of Middle Eastern origin.
I never said that Chinese counterfeiters were incapable of producing highly deceptive counterfeits. I was just making a point that the cheap stuff on the no-no site is not the only threat out there.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5832 Posts |
At least the buyers of these counterfeit coins in NGC and PCGS slabs has some form of insurance, with the TPG making the mistake of putting those counterfeit coin in their holders. Anyone know ANACS and IGC have that type of backing?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Type I would agree the cheap stuff on the eastern ebay site really isn't a threat. It's easy enough to spot. Given NGCs reaction which I suspect PCGS will follow this stuff isn't a massive threat either except for raw coins. NGCs statement leads me to believe they will repurchase all the mistakes to make it right. While that is an annoyance as long as they will make things right in the end when one slips through my confidence isn't shaken. Now if the point comes where they say not my problem the market will drastically change.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
Quote: Anyone know ANACS and IGC have that type of backing? They do.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4469 Posts |
"e-go-tech" and "kiki2010hy" are the same seller or getting counterfeit coins from the same source. Below are some coins that were submitted in the same batch to NGC that are sold by both "e-go-tech" and "kiki2010hy": e-go cert #2463807-014 321936792310 kiki #2643807-008 321938833389e-go cert #2792607-011 321936790938 kiki #2792707-006 321935861843There are also coin submitted to PCGS in the same batch that were sold by both "e-go-tech" and "kiki2010hy".
Edited by Slider23 12/19/2015 01:06 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Very nice detective work. 
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
New collector here. I've read Coin World, Numismatic News, Coinage, coin Prices, etc. Where do you find Coin Week? Shouldn't this info be published in CW and NN?
|
|
Valued Member
146 Posts |
Now if the point comes where they say not my problem the market will drastically change.
OR if they stop grading "problem" coins like the corroded coin that got past one of the services.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
13014 Posts |
Quote: OR if they stop grading "problem" coins like the corroded coin that got past one of the services That certainly would change the market as well. Those types of coins are a way for a lot of people to get dates or a level of detail they couldn't otherwise afford. To me as long as they stand behind what they do and make any mistakes right buying them back which it sounds like they are, they market shouldn't be affected much if at all.
|
|
Valued Member
59 Posts |
Dear Drew,Being an expert when it comes to counterfeit coins...I am VERY INTERESTED in finding out your qualifications. There might be some folks on this sight who actually are professionals such as J.P.Martin.
Perhaps for now, we should all calm down and let the evidence come in after the TPGS review the actual coins AGAIN. For example: Looks like the 1798 1c coins are Counterfeit and slipped past the TPGS.
It is extremely hard to detect THESE State-of-the-art fakes in hand. We have less of a chance trying it with photos. I applaud those guys who were able to match the contact marks on the large cent. Their work has been confirmed.
The TPGS guarantee their opinion so in the long run, no one will be hurt. In the old days, Secret Service would be notified about these sellers and they would be visited. SS has bigger fish to fry now.
One more thought. When ANACS was established as the first authentication service, the people who worked there knew that every opinion they rendered would be "checked" by a million eyes. Those "eyes" are still out there as proven by this thread!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4469 Posts |
Update the seller "kiki2010hy" had changed the ebay user ID to "happycoins2010" and happycoins2010 currently has no coins listed on ebay.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
Sounds like a name a person of Chinese culture would have. Implies good fortune.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1757 Posts |
In my new book coming out in November 2016 I have a chapter on Chinese Counterfeit Modern Coins and their die transfer methods and detection. I have analyzed over 100 Chinese coins from the die transfer process and examined their alloys. They are typically Fe/Ni, German Silver (Cu/Zn/Ni) and debased silver alloys. HOWEVER - once they are in a PCGS/NGC/ANACS holder - GAME OVER - as hand held and XRF bench top devices can't extrapolate out the plastic interference's of the coin being in the holder. However = In person these die transfer process are easy to spot IMO due to raised metal like air bubbles, their general off-appearance and/or raised small metal spots on the surface due to air bubbles and the difficulty of duplicating the AGE FACTOR of the third side. As most of you know I am an expert in contemporary circulating counterfeits (i.e., genuine period counterfeits) and have collections in over ten U.S./Foreign series - but once in a TPG holder and buying on the Internet - its difficult if the coin mimics the coin in the TPG database. At this point not even John Lorenzo and his Material Devices can help ... IMO. It seems the only time you can SPOT IT ... is when its TOO LATE ... when the coin is IN HAND. As we all know there are no regulations to stop this at the SOURCE (i.e., in China). John Lorenzo Numismatist United States
|
| |
Replies: 38 / Views: 8,193 |