| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,392 |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
99 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
 to CCF! Based on your pictures, I would grade your coin MS-63.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
63 tops too many marks on the face to be a 64.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
99 Posts |
That would figure. they had it graded at a 65 with after getting it I thought that was high. Thanks
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
99 Posts |
You guys are awesome. Have learned a lot from this form. Main one is to be very careful on internet coins.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
484 Posts |
Nice uncirculated Morgan. I'd buy it for the cool die breaks alone. Looks like a VAM 37.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Solid MS-63. Very nice luster -- bit of chatter on cheek keeps her out of 64
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
The die cracks are the best thing about this coin, and I digg it for those. With the chatter on the obverse, I'd be hesitant to value it over a 62.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3219 Posts |
63 is where I be.. The die cracks make for a very interesting coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
I agree. And - 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
63, too many contact marks on the face to go any higher.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18700 Posts |
I think its on the lower end of MS63. Closer to 62. Reverse looking pretty good
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 1,392 |
|