1923 KGV Nickel Near 3 Far 3 5 Cent -- New Variety?

I notice the two lines seem to be positioned differently in relation to the two points where they meet the back loops of the "3". I think it's the varying slant of the lines that give the illusion of near and far.

Like who cares.

The sellers is very poor at making an accurate line in their pics I see no difference IMO.
Hows the KGV nickel hunt going Bill? I checked the few 23s I have but no difference there either.

wow so maybe a new variation do to a change of dies, or die wear.nice

Thanks everyone for their opinions so far. Given that we have recognized different hubs used for 1926 and 1932, I think that it is totally possible that there are at least two different hubs used in 1923 (and maybe other years too - for example, I sometimes think I see a different looking 22s in 1922 but the difference is so slight that I usually give up and say what I'm seeing is Die Deterioration leading to smushy numbers. It's on my to do list to recheck this one day).

As I mentioned in my initial post I think I see the difference with 6x magnification and Castor's overlay appears to confirm that a difference exists.

But like the old men Statler and Waldorf said on the Muppet Show once, "The question is who cares?"

At this point, I'm not excited about it. What I need 5centscanada or someone else to do is show us how uncommon this variety is and if possible have a story go with it.

For me the 1932 Far meets this requirement. Personally, I came to the hunt for 1932 Far 2 late in the game as I didn't start collecting until 2014. I've read the historical posts for the 1932 Far 2 on this site and they are very interesting. I enjoy hunting for 1932 Far 2s. All the ones I've seen have the same die crack coming off the S of CENTS which suggests it is a single die (which originally was the specimen die for the year). I'm finding it hard to cherry pick them and I haven't cherry picked one since June of 2015 -- who's finding them all! My point here is that the 1932 Far 2 is an uncommon variety while the 1923 Far/Near 3 hasn't proved itself yet as being uncommon. And even if it did, I doubt it will excite many collectors because it is not very easy to see. Personally I'd rather have a big visible die crack than this hard to see hub difference.

@pennyman007 - Not much to report on the KGV 5 cent front except I bought a nice raw 1934 with all 8 pearls showing which I'd like to say is MS64 but I might be seriously deceiving myself. More exciting for me was finding a 1953 SF FL mule in what I grade as AU50 in a mixed lot of KGV & KGVI 5 cents I bought a few weeks ago. It's the first one of these I ever found and I was really happy, for a day or two. In the same lot there were also a couple of 1936 in ICCS AU condition and a handful of 1937 in MS. Normally I get stuck with bulk lots of just VG/F coins. Thanks for asking :-)

The differences are so minor with this coin, it is hardly relevant.

I think it is interesting. My question is that with the 4 variations would there be a space difference from the S in cents to the rim also?