Thanks pg! Yahoo, a variety that I didn't know I have.....(this doesn't happen very often)
Then the reference to both the flat-back 9 types on page 325 (bottom of page and under diagrams) seems just a printing error.
Your explanation of the "4" makes good sense, re: photograph on same page of the 4/4, if the lines were not visible it indeed looks exactly like a flared "4".
Then the reference to both the flat-back 9 types on page 325 (bottom of page and under diagrams) seems just a printing error.
Your explanation of the "4" makes good sense, re: photograph on same page of the 4/4, if the lines were not visible it indeed looks exactly like a flared "4".





















