| Author |
Replies: 26 / Views: 9,418 |
|
Valued Member
United States
190 Posts |
First, I need to make sure the people who answer this question understand what they are talking about because there is some confusion about what is a Specimen Strike. Although the coins in Mint sets are Proof-Like, they are not Specimen Strikes. Mint Sets are those that come in cellophane. So, how do they differ? Well, Mint Set PL are struck once on dies that are also used for Business Strikes. The reason why they look Proof is because each coin is carefully removed after minting for the Mint Sets, and not allowed to bang around with other cons like the Business Strikes. Some PL can be found in Bank Rolls, but most are pulled from cello protected Mint Sets. Specimen PLs are different from Mint Set PLs in the fact that Specimen coins are double struck to give them a more clear image. Specimen Sets were sometimes considered Proof Sets by both collectors and dealers until 1981. In 1981, the RCM started making real Proof Sets, but was still making Specimen and Mint Set Proof-Like coins too. Proof coins are easily identified, but Specimen PL and Mint Set PL look almost identical. Only the very trained can determined, which is which, so that is why I buy all my PL in cello. SP are never in cello, and come in Deluxe Sets. When I am talking about a PL strike, I mean a coin that was in cellophane and came from a Mint Set. When I am referring to SP I mean coins that come from a Deluxe Set and are not protected in Cellophane. Luckily, in 1996, SP Strikes were changed to Satin Finish Strikes, because it is really difficult to tell the difference between PL and SP if you do not know what set they were taken from. I am using a list to put my set together. I am collecting BU Business Strike from Bank Rolls, PL Proof-Like Strikes from Mint Sets in Cello, SP Specimen Strikes from Deluxe Proof Sets or Specimen Sets, and PR from Proof Sets. I am only collecting Canada One Cent Coins, so everything stops in 2012 for me. Okay, here is my question: In what years did the RCM make Specimen Sets containing a one cent coin? Okay, here is what my list says and this is only for Canada pennies minted from 1920 to 2012. Specimen Strikes with PL Finish: 1920 to 1932 (excluding 1929 High 9), 1937 to 1938 (including a 1937 Matte Finish), 1944 to 1947 (including all three 1947 varieties [no ML, ML Blunt 7, and ML Pointed 7]), 1948 (A points between Large Denticles "only"), 1949 (A points between Large Denticles "only", 1950 to 1952, 1953 (SF and NSF), 1964, 1965 (SBP5 & SBB5, and 1967 to 1995 (excluding 1985 Pointed 5). Specimen Strikes with Satin Finish: 1996 to 2000 (excluding 1998-W & 1999-P, but I include the 1998 Antique Finish Large Cent here too since it does not fit anyplace else.), 2001-P to 2006-P (excluding all other versions without Ps), and 2007 to 2012 (Always copper coated steel "Magnetic"). Is the list correct or is something missing or is something added that should not be on the list? I am wondering about 1964 in particular because I cannot find any 1964 SP sets on ebay. Thanks.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9862 Posts |
First you need to understand the difference between The Canadian and the US definition of PL. By Canadian definition PL coins cannot be pulled from a bankroll nor is there any such thing as a Specimen PL. When you can understand this concept you will be able to find an answer to your question for yourself.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
Edited by DBM 02/07/2016 3:41 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1005 Posts |
Quote:In what years did the RCM make Specimen Sets containing a one cent coin? Having a Charlton coin guide will make it easy to look up specimen coins. All the answers are there. Haxby's coins of Canada has an exhaustive list of specimen sets also.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9862 Posts |
Do you realize that a set of specimen cents from 1920-70 will cost you more than $300,000.00?
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
Edited by DBM 02/07/2016 3:58 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Prior thread relating to pre-1967 Specimen Sets. https://goccf.com/t/215368In 1967 the $20 gold coin set was issued in specimen finish. Otherwise sets containing Specimen finish coin were not formally available to the general public until the year 1971. Each different - no overlap Business Strike (circulation coin) - MS Specimen - SP Proof-Like (PL and later NBU) - merged in 2012 with business strike Proof - PR I agree, a Charlton guide is a helpful resource, Vol 2 provides information related to uncirculated coin, sets/finishes, etc.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
514 Posts |
I started reading the op's post, and couldn't help but notice a tone of condescention... that being said, this really does sum it up well; Quote: First you need to understand the difference between The Canadian and the US definition of PL. By Canadian definition PL coins cannot be pulled from a bankroll nor is there any such thing as a Specimen PL. When you can understand this concept you will be able to find an answer to your question for yourself. It's great to see interest in Canadian currency from a non-Canadian, but each of our countries mints do use slightly different verbiage to describe a given coin type/finish. It might be easier to adapt to the RCM descriptions regaurding finishes that way you can figure out what to look for from people who are familiar with Canadian coins and the RCM/Charelton descriptions. Good luck!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Padasap, I'm curious about your Cdn penny collection, maybe if we had more information we could give you better advise. I recall you hoped to collect pennies of various types and varieties. But is your intention to collect each different finish as well? The reason I ask is because the appearance between the different finishes is not always that noticeably distinct and I'd guess for pennies perhaps even less considering they were never a primary focus in any type of set (aside from some proof sets).
As far as Specimen sets, from 1971 to 1995, brilliant relief against brilliant background (similar to PL, except for some PL cameos can be found prior to the later part of the '70s) 1996 - 2009: brilliant relief, frosted legends and date against a lined background (similar to 96-97 PL) 2010 - on: instead of lined, the background is lazar lined.
Edited by wildflowerAB 02/08/2016 01:36 am
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10456 Posts |
This statement, Quote: The reason why they look Proof is because each coin is carefully removed after minting for the Mint Sets, and not allowed to bang around with other cons like the Business Strikes. is incorrect. The Royal Canadian Mint used burnished planchets for their proof-like (PL) and specimen strikes. They also used slower presses with higher pressures That is why they look so much better than business strikes.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
190 Posts |
Quote:"is incorrect. The Royal Canadian Mint used burnished planchets for their proof-like (PL) and specimen strikes. They also used slower presses with higher pressures That is why they look so much better than business strikes." Okay, I might be a victim of bad information here. Are PL from Mint Sets different from PL from Specimen Sets? I am of course excluding the satin finish SP coins from this question, which are obviously different. I am not sure where I got the information now, but I know it came from a Canada Coin Dealer that I thought was an expert. The dealer said that the PL strikes in the Mint Sets were early strikes, and the methods used to make them were no different than those made to mint Business Strikes. This made sense to me because PL Morgan dollars are not specially made, but are early strikes that result in a Proof-Like Finish because new polished dies are used to strike them. Normally, only a few hundred coins have the PL look before the dies start to break down. But, you are saying the RCM used a special method to make PLs for Mint sets. I also was told by the same dealer or another one, I am not sure now to be honest, that Specimen Set PLs was not the same as Mint Set PLs in that all Specimen Set coins were double struck under higher pressure to intentionally create the PL look and give the coins much more complete details. The SP sets were the Canada Proof Set until 1981 when real Proof coins were minted for the first time. Now this is the information that I have been given, so if it is incorrect, then I need to know the truth, and I apreciate your help. I also apologize for stating incorrect information as I trusted the source more than I should have trusted them. This would explain why some dealers on ebay sell PL and SP as the same strike. What I am doing, and I have repeated this several times now, is I am collecting all the different finishes for each year from 1953 to 2012, plus all special issues, and some major varieties. Okay, I am collecting Business Strikes from Bank Rolls or Mint Bags, PL Strikes from Mint Sets in Cellophane, SP Strikes from Specimen Proof Sets, SP Strikes with Satin Finish, Proof Strikes from Proof Sets, and the lone antique finish 1998 special edition Large Cent. I am collecting the major varieties such as the 1985 (Pointed 5), 1983 (Far from rim beads and near to rim beads varieties), 1965 (all four varieties), and some of the other varieties with values less than $100. I am not collecting the 1936 dot for example although I have already collected 1920 to 1936 in circulated condition. I still need 1925, 1926, and 1929 (High 9) to finish that section up. I am also trying to collect 1937 to 2012 Business Strikes in Choice/Gem BU Red. I have been able to snag 1937 to 1940 for $5 each, and I have 1947 to 2012 completed in Choice/Gem BU Red minus some of the varieties that I have in circulated condition or BU Red/Brown. I will post my checklist next, so you can see what I have been using as my guide. I got this checklist from this forum or from someplace that someone on this forum directed me to this list. I am avoiding buying the reference books because I am almost done with the collection, and the cost of the books are too great. I would much rather spend the money on another coin, than on the reference guide. Also, I have you guys to guide me. ;)
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9862 Posts |
Quote: Are PL from Mint Sets different from PL from Specimen Sets? You are still using the US definition of PL. There are no PL Specimen coins by Canadian definition. For Canadian coins PL and Specimen denote special minting processes used by the RCM. A coin cannot be both PL and Specimen,as PL denotes a minting process, not neccesarily an attractive appearance.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
Edited by DBM 02/10/2016 12:11 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Quote:
The SP sets were the Canada Proof Set until 1981 when real Proof coins were minted for the first time.
This is true. However prior to 1981 for a time there were two different types of Specimen grade mint sets. Indeed some Specimen coins according to the COA are indeed double struck, but is that a standard of Specimen finish, I can't say but I don't think so. The problem with the collection of just one single coin is that you're not privy to the COA. The ambiguity - Aside from the 1967 Gold coin set, the first "Speciment grade" referred to as a Prestige Set (or Double Dollar), available to the public began in 1971. In 1973 one dollar was nickel and the other was changed to silver. The series continued until 1981. However page 373 in 2015 Charlton "with the end of the 1976 Olympics, and with the new numismatic production now in place, the Mint staff turned their attention to improving their numismatic product line. The quality of the custom sets was upgraded to Specimen." So in 1976 the mint began produced what was called "Seven Coin Nickel Custom Specimen Sets". It goes on to say "1981 saw the first officially stated issue of specimen coinage"....with the "six coin nickel specimen sets, 1981-1996". This seems to indicate "Specimen" finish from various mint sets was not standardized prior to 1981. As well, if you are collecting by "appearance" even Proof-Like coin at one time had varied appearances: ultra heavy cameo, heavy cameo, cameo or no cameo.
Edited by wildflowerAB 02/10/2016 1:31 pm
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10456 Posts |
Quote: Are PL from Mint Sets different from PL from Specimen Sets? Yes, they are different. We have business strikes, proof-like strikes, specimen strikes, and proof strikes. The name specimen strike would also include the newer "lined" fields versions. Quote: The dealer said that the PL strikes in the Mint Sets were early strikes, and the methods used to make them were no different than those made to mint Business Strikes. In this field, no one is an expert - we all still learning from various things that were done in previous generations. The same dies were used for PL strikes and business strikes, but the presses would have been set entirely different and different planchets were used. It is most likely that pre-1967 PL and SP strikes used the same burnished planchets. Quote: I am collecting all the different finishes for each year from 1953 to 2012, plus all special issues, and some major varieties. I collect the same thing, with 1c strikes. It goes without saying that some of the earlier specimen strikes are exceedingly scarce and expensive.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Moderator
 Canada
10456 Posts |
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert OppenheimerContent of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_USMy eBay store
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
190 Posts |
Well, I tried about three different ways to post my list, but I cannot get it to post right. Here is what I have on my list long hand...
Business Strike: 1920 to 1929, 1929 (High 9), 1930 to 1947, 1947 (ML with B7, 1947 (ML with P7), 1948 (Sm. Denticles), 1948 (A points to Lg. Denticles), 1948 (A points between Lg. Denticles), 1949 (A points to Lg. Denticles), 1949 (A points between Lg. Denticles), 1950 to 1952, 1953 (NSF), 1953 (SF), 1954 (SF), 1955 (SF with Sm. Denticles), 1955 (SF with Lg. Denticles), 1955 (NSF), 1956 to 1964, 1965 (Varieties 1, 2, 3, and 4), 1966 to 1982, 1983 (Near to Rim Beads), 1983 (Far from Rim Beads), 1984, 1985 (BP), 1985 (P5), 1986 to 1998, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2002-P, 2003 (Old Effigy), 2003 (New Effigy), 2003-P (Old Effigy), 2003-P (New Effigy), 2004, 2004-P, 2005, 2005-P, 2006 (Zinc, No Logo), 2006 (Steel, No P & No Logo), 2006 (Zinc, Logo), 2006-P (Zinc), 2006-P (Steel). 2007 (Steel), 2008 (Steel), 2009 (Zinc), 2009 (Steel), 2010 (Zinc), 2011 (Zinc), 2011 (steel), 2012 (Zinc), and 2012 (Steel).
Proof-Like/NBU Strike in Cellophane from Mint sets: 1953 (SF), 1954 (SF), 1954 (NSF), 1955 (SF and Lg. Denticles), 1956 1964, 1965 (All four varieties), 1966 to 1982, 1983 (both varieties), 1985 to 1995, 1996 (Satin Finish), 1997 (Satin Finish), 1998, 1998-W, 1999, 1999-P, 2000-W, 2000-P, 2001-P, 2002-P, 2003-P (Old Effigy), 2003-WP, 2004-P, 2005-P (Zinc), 2005-P (Steel), 2006 (Steel, Logo), 2006-P, 2007 (Zinc), 2007 (Steel), 2008 (Steel), 2009 (Steel), 2010 (Zinc), 2010 (Steel), 2011 (Zinc), 2011 (Steel), 2012 (Zinc), and 2012 (Steel).
Specimen Strike from Deluxe/Specimen Sets (PL): 1920 to 1932, 1934, 1937, 1937 (Matte), 1938, 1944 to 1946, 1947 (All three Varieties), 1948 (A Points to Lg. Denticles), 1949 (A Points to Lg. Denticles), 1950 to 1952, 1953 (both types), 1964, 1965 (Sm. Beads and Pointed 5), 1965 (Sm. Beads and Blunt 5), 1967 to 1982, 1983 (both), 1984 to 1995.
Specimen Strike with Satin Finish: 1996 to 2000, 2001-P, 2002-P, 2003-P (Old Effigy), 2004-P to 2006-P, 2007 (Steel only) to 2012 (steel only).
Antique Finish: 1998, I put this with the SP coins.
Proof (Always copper): 1981, 1982, 1983 (Both), 1984 to 1998, 1998 (Large Cent), 1999 to 2002 (No P or W), 2003 (1953-2003), 2003(Old Effigy), 2003 (Annual Report), 2004 to 2009, 2010 (1935-2010), 2010, 2011 (1911-2011 Large Cent), 2011, 2012, 2012 (Silver), and 2012 (Silver) Five coin set.
This is my list that I am using. If anything is incorrect, please let me know. Thanks.
Edited by pasasap 02/10/2016 6:11 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
190 Posts |
SPP-Ottawa, Thanks you. I was not aware there were three different methods for PL strikes. Yes, you are collecting exactly the same way I am attempting to collect. It seems that I stepped into a bit of a war here. But, I am only going by what the grading companies are using for strike notations. The Canada based grading company that I see on ebay, NGC, and PCGS are all using the notations, MS, PL, SP, and PR for the different strikes. They add the term Satin for the striation pattern cents. Burnished and Matte are also terms used, but I do not think I will encounter any of those pennies as they are probably all very expensive. Also, the list I am using was not created by me, but came from someone on here. I am using it to complete the set. I also have another list of all the clashing and Machine Doubling errors that another person provided to me from this forum. They copied the information from their album. I am planning on completing that portion of my collection once I get this other list completed. I would be happy to trade Proof and SPs for errors, if anyone is interested. I have several doubles because I had to buy big lots to get discounts. I also wanted to pick the best possible quality from a nice group of coins. My set is looking really nice now. Here is what I have collected, so far. Business Strikes: 1920 to 1924, and 1927 to 1936 are all in circulated condition. I am missing 1925, 1926, 1929 (High 9), and 1936 (dot). My 1921 is BU. Business Strikes in BU: 1937 to 2012 are mostly Choice BU Red or better. I am missing 1948 and 1949 (A points to Large Denticles), 1955 (SF & Large Denticles), 1955 (NSF), 1965 (Variety 4), and most of the clashing die error coins. 1937, 1948, and 1952 are BU Red/Brown. 1953 (SF) is circulated. 1941 to 1946 are also circulated. I am attempting to get everything from 1937 to 2012 in BU Red, but some may just be too expensive. I also have the 2006 (No P and No Logo) "Steel" or Magnetic, which is the error coin. PL from Mint Sets (1953 to 2012): My list says these did not come into existence until 1953 with the 1953 (SF) coin. I have in my set 1958 to 2012. Some of the varieties in the 2000's are not found in PL sets according to the list. My list says that 1985 (P5) only exist as a Business Strike, which I have in the set. My list says that the 1983 (Far and Near Beads) exist in all four categories. I am missing Far Beads for PL, SP, and PR. I have both 1983 Varieties in BU Business Strikes. I am also missing 1965 (V1, V3, and V4) in PL. For 1996 and 1997, the sets came with Satin Finish SP Strikes, so I added them to the PL category, which represents all coins coming from Regular Mint Sets. I am also missing the 2004 Test Set Penny, but I have the 1999-P. Specimen Set Coins (SP): I am not collecting any of the coins before 1952; although, there is a 1950 on ebay for $60. I lucked out and got a 1953 (NSF) Specimen Strike in a lot I purchased off of ebay. Other than that one, I do not have anymore until 1965. My list shows the SPs ending in 1953, and then starting up again in 1964. There is a 1964 SP posted on ebay for sale. The list says that 1965 (V1 and V2) are available in SP, but not (V3 or V4). I have is the 1965 (V2) in PL, but I am not 100% positive that it is an SP strike although it was sold as an SP. I have 1967 that I saw the dealer take from the Deluxe set, so I know it is an SP. I may also have 1968, but it was an ebay purchase just like the 1965. I have 1973 to 1995 with the PL finish from SP sets (deluxe sets) minus the 1983 (Far Beads). I have 1996 to 2012-P with the Satin Finish. I put the 1998 Large Cent with the Antique Finish in this section with the SP group. For Proof, I have 1981 to 2007 minus the 1983 (Far Beads). I have 2010, 2011, 2012, and 2012 in silver. I am missing only 2008, 2009, 2010 (1935-2010, Special Edition Small Cent) and 2011 (1911-2011, Special Edition Large Cent). I put the Copper plated silver 1998 Large Cent in Proof here too. So, you see, if the list is correct, I almost have collected what I can except for the clashing errors, which are next on my agenda. Most of the errors are listed for $1 or $2 on ebay, so it should not take too long to get what I can afford. If anyone needs Proof (1981 to 2005) or PL or SP, let me know. I would probably trade most of extras for error coins. A one to one trade should be fair in most cases. All errors must be in Choice/Gem BU Red or Choice/Gem PL Red similar to my coins. I have mostly extra proof and Specimen from 1973 to 2005. I have a few Mint Set PLs, but not many; however, a few are still in Cellophane. I put the pennies in coin capsules, and then put the capsules into Mylar Cardboard flips. I then write the information on the cardboard and place the coins in pages in a collector's binder. I like this way better than the albums. I also feel the coins are better protected in the capsules. Well, that is all I have left to say. If you guys could look at my list and make sure it is correct, then that would be very helpful to me. Thank you for your help. :)
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
190 Posts |
Just so I am clear here about what was being said. Are some of you saying the PL from the Regular Mint Sets in Cellophane in the envelopes are the same as those coming from the Deluxe Specimen Sets? Some of the dealers on ebay claim the PLs are the same, but then they say they do not know where the coins are coming from exactly. I was thinking that they were just trying to make a sell. Other dealers have told me that the strikes are different as I have described already. NGC and PCGS are using the terms MS, PL, SP, SP Satin Finish, and PR to separate the different strikes on slabs. Is it true these are all different strikes or is there some argument against this idea? For instance, the MS or Business Strikes, I have heard repeatedly are the same as the PL from Mint Sets. But, I see that some disagree with this notion and have explained very clearly why they are different. I tend to think they are different for the simple fact that they look different, so that is why I am collecting both types. However, I also am collecting both PL and SP because I was told they are different and also the grading companies separate them. Collecting US Lincoln Cents is much easier because we only have three strikes, MS, PR, and MS Satin Finish (2005 to 2010 "only from Mint Sets").
|
| |
Replies: 26 / Views: 9,418 |
To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use
|
| Coin Community Forum |
© 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums |
| It took 0.63 seconds to rattle this change. |
 |
|