In your searches, did you exclude terms like "not". For example, a listing may state "not a replica", but a search for only "replica" would lead one to believe that the listing was "fraudulent".
Statistically speaking, using research on one specific coin (8R) and then applying it to all coins is just not valid. 8R are known to be frequently counterfeited. This is like polling people in a specific prison to find that 60% of them are murderers, and then extrapolating that to mean 60% of the world's population are murderers.
If I studied, say, 50¢ car wash tokens listed on ebay, and found no fakes, I could extrapolate that to mean there are no fakes being sold on ebay. It, obviously, would not be a valid extrapolation.
However, regardless of the size of the fraudulent coin selling on ebay, if ebay REMOVED sellers (NARU) that sold fakes, and consistently removed them, regardless of how long they have been with ebay or how high their sales volume, the problem would start to become more manageable.
Statistically speaking, using research on one specific coin (8R) and then applying it to all coins is just not valid. 8R are known to be frequently counterfeited. This is like polling people in a specific prison to find that 60% of them are murderers, and then extrapolating that to mean 60% of the world's population are murderers.
If I studied, say, 50¢ car wash tokens listed on ebay, and found no fakes, I could extrapolate that to mean there are no fakes being sold on ebay. It, obviously, would not be a valid extrapolation.
However, regardless of the size of the fraudulent coin selling on ebay, if ebay REMOVED sellers (NARU) that sold fakes, and consistently removed them, regardless of how long they have been with ebay or how high their sales volume, the problem would start to become more manageable.
Show your financial support of the Coin Community Family (click here)
See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)
See my topic on Mexican Numismatic Medals (click here)




















