Depends on what you mean by frost.
Frosted can mean coins that look like they are white with frost - very high mint state coins but with "frosty" instead of "prooflike" luster. "Blast white" gets used a lot, too.
You can also refer to cameo devices on Proofs as "frosted." They contrast with the brilliant mirrored fields, creating a "black-and-white" look.
As far as frosted proofs go: I'm not an expert but I will share what I know.
I've seen some of the very, very early proofs (late 18th and early 19th c.)
By modern standards some collectors might even find them unattractive, being full of die polishing lines, recutting, and other artifacts.
A proof strike was originally just that -- to prove that a design was suitable for minting. These coins were struck not only for preservation (e.g. the Mint Cabinet) but also used to reward dignitaries, representatives, ambassadors, influential businessmen, etc. You might see them referred to as "specimens." I think this ran through the early 1830s.
IIRC the first trading of "proof" coins to collectors and individuals started in the later years of the 1830s. By the late 1850s the Mint started selling Proof coins directly to the public.
From the late 1850s onward you can find CAM and (very rarely) DCAM/UCAM Proofs. Those have the "frosted" look accentuated.
The
Morgan dollars, in particular, had the "frosty cameo" look for Uncirculated coins on early die strikes, most often on 1878-1881 coins minted in San Francisco, and occasionally on coins from the other 2 mints. Those Prooflike/Deep Mirror Prooflike resulted from very fine polishing of the fields, which lasted for however many hundreds/thousands of strikes before taking on an appearance of a normal Uncirculated
Morgan dollar (non-PL.)
Member
ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890
"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis