Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1872-S Half Dime - What Do You Think? (PCGS)

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 1,705Next Topic
Page: of 2
Pillar of the Community
oih82w8's Avatar
United States
7840 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  4:13 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add oih82w8 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
Here is a recent purchase and would like to see what the CCF Members had to say about her in comparison to PCGS.

 

1872-S-Half-Dime---What-Do-You-Think?-PCGS

1872-S-Half-Dime---What-Do-You-Think?-PCGS

 

Thank you for your interest and comments!
Edited by oih82w8
03/09/2016 07:21 am
Bedrock of the Community
BH1964's Avatar
United States
10982 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  6:06 pm  Show Profile   Check BH1964's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add BH1964 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Obverse detail is mushy as if it was struck through heavy grease or similar. Reverse is better but not great either so the strike is sub-par in my book. The luster looks pretty good but with the strike I'd rate the eye appeal as a notch below average. So even though the surface preservation is gem-like the grade is no better than MS63 and I wouldn't pay MS62 money for it myself. I don't really like it and hope you're not offended.
ANA #R3154474
Pillar of the Community
MeadowviewCollector's Avatar
United States
4409 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  6:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add MeadowviewCollector to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I think it's MS63

Several 1872-S's I looked at displayed similar dentils
Pillar of the Community
oih82w8's Avatar
United States
7840 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  6:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add oih82w8 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
No offense at all...I did ask for opinions/comments.
Edited by oih82w8
03/08/2016 6:40 pm
Pillar of the Community
CoinCollector2012's Avatar
United States
8137 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  6:56 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add CoinCollector2012 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS-62
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
panzaldi's Avatar
United States
18712 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  8:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add panzaldi to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm not a fan either. Don't care for the color. The left side of the obverse bothers me. Either heavily polished die hairlines or whizzed or something. Mushy strike. If I didn't already own it I would pass
Bedrock of the Community
paralyse's Avatar
United States
12057 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  10:01 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add paralyse to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is a MS coin.

At first I thought it appeared to be a case of misalignment / ablation, especially with the diagnostic parallel marks.

Strike Doubling is present on the legends.

However, on second thought I believe this to be an adjustment strike; other thoughts that came to mind included greased collar, or a partial collar broadstrike, but the diameter does not look enlarged. If it is an adjustment strike this would explain the misalignment and the smudge or slide effect, and the heavy die file lines.

Just my thoughts.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890

"Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
Pillar of the Community
D0ubl3Eagle's Avatar
United States
5854 Posts
 Posted 03/08/2016  10:39 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add D0ubl3Eagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'll go with MS-63.
Pillar of the Community
dsfreeworld's Avatar
United States
4337 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  08:23 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add dsfreeworld to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Are those possibly striations on the left obverse? Broken (D) and on that side the reverse is weakly struck. San Fran strikes are known for having issues of one sort or another on Liberty Seated coinage of all denoms. I would not kick her out of my house. I think PCGS gave her an MS62
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  11:18 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
PCGS is looking for after mint distractions for technical grade first, then considers strike, tone, etc., for the market grade, which is the numeric assignment provided.

In this instance the technical grade is MS-63 and I do not believe it suffers from enough after mint disturbance to reduce that grade.
Bedrock of the Community
BH1964's Avatar
United States
10982 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  1:22 pm  Show Profile   Check BH1964's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add BH1964 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
PCGS is looking for after mint distractions for technical grade first, then considers strike, tone, etc., for the market grade, which is the numeric assignment provided.

In this instance the technical grade is MS-63 and I do not believe it suffers from enough after mint disturbance to reduce that grade.


The first sentence says, "PCGS uses post-mint distractions to determine technical grade" and the second sentence says, "Post-mint distractions aren't bad enough to alter the technical grade".

They contradict one another with neither being entirely correct.

Strike should be a part of a mint state coin's technical grade as should surface preservation. Luster, toning and eye appeal are usually regarded as market grading characteristics.

As to the OP's coin if you only consider surface preservation (i.e. post-mint distractions) then the coin is a gem MS65 easily because the surfaces are nearly pristine; It may even be an MS66 on that basis alone. But since half the grade involves strike, luster, color, eye appeal, etc that's where it falls way short and I would say it's worth MS62 money which is what market grading is all about.

ANA #R3154474
Bedrock of the Community
IndianGoldEagle's Avatar
United States
36880 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  1:40 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add IndianGoldEagle to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS-63
Pillar of the Community
oih82w8's Avatar
United States
7840 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  2:21 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add oih82w8 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
This is what I really like about the CCF members, the discussion that takes place.
Edited by oih82w8
03/09/2016 2:23 pm
Pillar of the Community
Slider23's Avatar
United States
4471 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  2:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Slider23 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I like the toning on the coin and the die polish lines do not bother me. MS63
Pillar of the Community
babysitr's Avatar
United States
1339 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  9:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add babysitr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It's so different that if it's in a MS holder, that alone makes it a study in coin minting! I rather like it! It's likely a MS coin, easily would stir up discussion, and has
Bedrock of the Community
Joseph7420's Avatar
Canada
11922 Posts
 Posted 03/09/2016  10:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Joseph7420 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
MS-63?
  Previous TopicReplies: 17 / Views: 1,705Next Topic
Page: of 2

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.39 seconds to rattle this change. Forums