| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,669 |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1388 Posts |
Thoughts? I'm on mobile, so sorry for the mediocre pics.  
|
|
|
|
Valued Member
United States
431 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1339 Posts |
I can see it at MS63 also
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Despite some cheek chatter, I think this is solidly in the MS-64 category. Drop dead gorgeous luster and reverse is 65+
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
The reverse is nice enough to pull it up to 64.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
10625 Posts |
Solid MS63+. The cheek holds it back from 64 for me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5673 Posts |
MS-63 because of the chatter on the cheek, despite a gorgeous reverse.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
I'd call it about 40% MS63 / 60% MS64, so figure MS63+ for the nice peripheral toning. Great looking Morgan. Cleaner cheek and she'd breeze into a 64 holder. It's a PQ coin at a 63 grade.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
23731 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Definitely 64, imo. Beauty!
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18681 Posts |
so close to 64 it can smell it! very nice strike for an "O" mint
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5854 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 1,669 |