First and most important...Thanks to all for the comments and time spent...as I noted in my post, this coin top two pictures is using only natural light in the room, using a magnifying camera. I then retook pictures of the same coin using light, which my camera has built into it. I can not filter the light but I can turn it up very bright and down to where it is hardly noticeable.
I did not clean the coin before or after shooting these pictures or at anytime since I
inherited them. My Dad was a collector and I doubt he would have cleaned the coin, but maybe it was cleaned before he got it?
I am confused as some of you say these are two coins and there are not! These pictures were taken by me minutes apart, yesterday with and without using the built in light in the camera. I did it this way because I noticed with the camera lights on you can see the detail this coin has but you lose the patina. With just ambient room light, you see the coin the way it really looks. If the top pictures look "cleaned" to you all...then it must have been cleaned. But if the determination of the coin being cleaned came for the bottom two pictures, I can assure you that that is the exact same coin unchanged and barely touched (except to turnover), within minutes of the top pictures, except taken with lights!
I think my attempt to get different pictures using this new camera I am using, did not help, but just confused the issue. Does this change anyone's opinion or tell me what I can do to present coins for evaluation by this group to improve? I have 6-8 different coins I would like to post over the next few weeks...