| Author |
Replies: 109 / Views: 16,709 |
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
The ONA apparently had some concerns but not acted upon. Safe bet it will not happen again.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3690 Posts |
Not to take anything away from the issue here - RCNA apparently condoning counterfeit coin displays and such - but when was the last time anyone was charged with owning, displaying or even trying to sell (or selling) fake NCLT? Of course there was the toonie factory but that was huge and circulation coinage. We all know that's different...just read this forum where plenty of users sanctimoniously dismiss NCLT as not 'real money', 'not legal tender', 'granny bait' etc. etc. We saw a big splash last year in Toronto about significant merchandise but has anyone, anywhere ever been charged for counterfeit NCLT in Canada? I ask sincerely because I cannot find a single case. Even with merchandise it seems police usually just seize the goods. Not really much risk if you can buy 100 items, sell most at huge profits and have a few seized by police. I suspect the RCMP wouldn't be the least bit concerned about a single Kijiji ad for some fake NCLT 'souvenirs'. Don't get me wrong. Counterfeiting is a significant threat to our hobby, I just fail to see what police (enforcement) or governments (education) are actually doing about it.
Edited by CC-Ottawa 05/05/2016 1:30 pm
|
|
New Member
Canada
6 Posts |
Dear Fellow Numismatists, The Royal Canadian Numismatic Association has received an official complaint about one of its member's sale of counterfeit NCLT items. We are required to follow a protocol set out in our governing By-Laws to thoroughly investigate the circumstances of a complaint before making any judgement or comment. The person(s) initiating the complaint will be informed of the results as soon as the investigation is complete. Further, the RCNA is acutely aware of the legal and hobby related ramifications of counterfeit collector, NCLT and bullion coins being produced in China. I want to thank everyone who has expressed concerns with the RCNA's alleged involvement and reassure you that the Association does not support the sale or exhibition of any counterfeit material as stipulated by our stringent Code of Ethics, part of our Associations By-Laws. Sincerely, Henry Nienhuis President, Royal Canadian Numismatic Association
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
Thank you for taking the time to respond Henry. MM
|
|
New Member
 Canada
9 Posts |
Quote: "You were the one who brought up the other coins, when you said that the banks would accept such coins. My tresponce was that they would not and I sent you the article. I removed the coins from my ad, but that does not seem to have satisfied you since you want to keep harassing me about them. Obviously nothing better to do with your time. I am fully aware of what the criminal code says since I talk about the code in my display of counterfeit coins which I exhibit at major coin shows. This exhibit has won several awards. I even bought 8 additional coins for the display at a recent major coin show." (The beginning of the email is in reference as to whether NCLT is accepted at banks or not. He claims they are not accepted at banks.)I got this response at 10AM this morning. Its as if he refuses to just acknowledge that it IS illegal to sell these because he's gotten away with it for so long. I just dont get it. I am "harassing" him. He actively purchases these from China for display at his shows. Giving money to these crooks. I don't mind him displaying these coins for educational purposes. (personal opinion) However, selling these coins and introducing them into the marketplace is absolutely not acceptable when people like Mike Marshall are making an unending effort to stop these from flooding the market. Anyways, I am glad he removed them from Kijiji, though I'm not confident he wont try to sell them elsewhere judging by his remorseless email.
Edited by sophiew 05/05/2016 5:45 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2019 Posts |
Quote:
Anyways, I am glad he removed them from Kijiji, though I'm not confident he wont try to sell them elsewhere judging by his remorseless email. Sad thing is, he will try to sell them elsewhere and people will buy them , the Mint/RCMP really need to start making examples of these people, at the very least some big enough fines that make it unprofitable to bother trying to sell this junk. But Like CCC has said, does anyone know someone who has gotten charged for selling these? I don't...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
On another kijiji ad he mentions trips to China, this one he lists the various numismatic associations he's involved with, I assume to assure collectors looking to sell that he's respectable and trustworthy. http://www.kijiji.ca/v-art-collecti...ionFlag=trueBut that leads one to conclude that his main business isn't just selling $75 fake superman sets on kijiji.... I agree, I'm not so sure the RCMP would be too interested if there's no proof of actually having sold counterfeits, only listing, but it's reassuring that RCNA is taking the information seriously, considering membership is being used as a leverage.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
5324 Posts |
The RCMP will never act on any counterfeiting items until the harmed party in this case the RCM ask, we kind of know the RCM's position on this matter. As mentioned it's illegal in Canada to own a copied coin.
|
|
New Member
Canada
7 Posts |
Hello all forum members, I was made aware of the ongoing situation from the RCNA President and spent considerable time discussing it with him. The ONA at this time will wait for the RCNA to complete its investigation and once that has been completed, will take in to consideration any appropriate actions. The ONA has the following statement in our Bylaws under Code of Ethics Section 10(vii) reads: As a member of the Ontario Numismatic Association the individual: "Agrees not to sell, exhibit, produce or advertise counterfeits, copies, restrikes and reproductions of any numismatic items if their nature is not clearly indicated by the word counterfeit, copy, restrike, or reproduction incused in metal or printed on the paper thereof, with the exception of items listed in standard catalogues and generally accepted by numismatists and not in any way misrepresented as genuine" Others have mentioned in these forums that the ONA member involved had exhibited at our recent convention. Our exhibit rules allow for the this type of exhibit as you can see from this excerpt: 13. Any numismatic material, known to be a legitimate copy or replica, must be labeled. Any material known to be forged, spurious or counterfeit will not be displayed unless the exhibit is titled and labeled as an educational exhibit of forgeries. Once the RCNA has reached an outcome from their investigation, the ONA will take into consideration changing the exhibit rule above to one that more resembles the RCNA exhibit rule on this topic. The ONA will not be making any further judgement or comments until the RCNA investigation is completed. Robb McPherson Ontario Numismatic Association - President
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2845 Posts |
Quote:
"Agrees not to sell, exhibit, produce or advertise counterfeits, copies, restrikes and reproductions of any numismatic items if their nature is not clearly indicated by the word counterfeit, copy, restrike, or reproduction incused in metal or printed on the paper thereof, with the exception of items listed in standard catalogues and generally accepted by numismatists and not in any way misrepresented as genuine"
It would appear that ONA Bylaws are In violation of Canada's Criminal Code. PART XII Offences Relating to Currency Interpretation Marginal note:Definitions Section 448 In this Part, counterfeit money includes(a) a false coin or false paper money that resembles or is apparently intended to resemble or pass for a current coin or current paper money, (b) a forged bank-note or forged blank bank-note, whether complete or incomplete, (c) a genuine coin or genuine paper money that is prepared or altered to resemble or pass for a current coin or current paper money of a higher denomination, (d) a current coin from which the milling is removed by filing or cutting the edges and on which new milling is made to restore its appearance, (e) a coin cased with gold, silver or nickel, as the case may be, that is intended to resemble or pass for a current gold, silver or nickel coin, and
(f) a coin or a piece of metal or mixed metals that is washed or coloured by any means with a wash or material capable of producing the appearance of gold, silver or nickel and that is intended to resemble or pass for a current gold, silver or nickel coin; (monnaie contrefaite)<snipped> Possession Marginal note:Possession, etc., of counterfeit money Section 450 Every one who, without lawful justification or excuse, the proof of which lies on him, (a) buys, receives or offers to buy or receive, (b) has in his custody or possession, or (c) introduces into Canada, counterfeit money is guilty of an indictable offence and liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding fourteen years. Source: http://laws-lois.justice.gc.ca/eng/...html#docCont
Edited by wildflowerAB 05/06/2016 02:53 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
As I said earlier The ONA and RCNA don't seem to understand that their rules do not trump Canadian law. It does not matter that the display conformed to their rules. Their rules and bylaws as they stand allow for and condone illegal activity.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
Once I read the garbage by-laws of the ONA I saw the butt protecting outs they (the ONA) had in allowing the display. I was emailed by the seller involved and he has admitted he purchased the counterfeits for a client? I have no issue with ANY individual attempting to further identify and educate on the counterfeit issue. That being said, as soon as he attempted to sell them at an enormous profit he has lost the ability to use the EDUCATIONAL card. I will provide (if they request it) the email thread between the seller and myself to both the RCNA and the ONA to further their investigations as it clearly shows that there are now two attempts at selling counterfeit coins. They are counterfeit coins no matter what the ONA bylaws state. (what a joke.)
Edited by nickelsguy 05/06/2016 06:39 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
Quote: I have no issue with ANY individual attempting to further identify and educate on the counterfeit issue. The problem is that there are literally thousands of "collectors" who use "educational use"as a trump card to justify their purchase of these counterfeit coins. What will be the final disposition of these tens of thousands of fakes? Most will likely be sold off by heirs and estate sellers as genuine coins, that's how this situation will devolve. That's why purchase and possession is illegal and should remain so.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
2301 Posts |
As long as they actually educate DBM. That is part of the law. A display is not educating as owning them is not educating.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
9865 Posts |
The ONA and RCNA executive should have a look at this section of the forum. http://www.coincommunity.com/forum/...FORUM_ID=161Our US host on this forum bobby1313 has sellers of Canadian counterfeit removed within 24 hours. He has no interest in Canadian coins whatsoever, only a mission to protect this hobby. How and why is it that he can do more to fight counterfeits than our Numismatic Associations which are supposed to have our interests as the cause of their existence. It's because he doesn't pussyfoot around the issues,he calls a spade a spade and eliminates the threat.
"Dipping" is not considered cleaning... -from PCGS website
|
| |
Replies: 109 / Views: 16,709 |