| Author |
 Replies: 13 / Views: 1,154 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
  Here is a second 1907 No Periods $10 gold Indian piece. This one is PCGS graded. What do think this one grades? I included some historical notes about this piece with the other example of this coin that I posted, so I won't repeat them here.
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3210 Posts |
MS63 maybe 64....That hit on the face may have kept it from 64. Nice coins nonetheless.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
6370 Posts |
I like the other one better, but I think this one still gets an MS-64.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
4078 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree 64; don't like this one quite as much as the NGC-graded example. But a beauty in any event.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4470 Posts |
MS64 I graded this one at 64 because of the small mark on the cheek. The coin does have excellent luster and PCGS tends to like strong luster.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18708 Posts |
i'll go 64 on this one. the other is a little nicer
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
1499 Posts |
PCGS graded this 1907 $10 Indian gold coin as an MS-64, and it has a green CAC sticker. The coin has better than average luster for this issue. If it were not for the mark on the cheek that some of you noted, this piece might have made MS-65.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5828 Posts |
nice coin!   |
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4989 Posts |
Looks 64 and amazingly I don't think it's as nice as the other $10 gold you posted that got the MS-61 from NGC. PCGS 1, NGC 0!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1499 Posts |
Yes, luster gets more credit than it deserves more often than at PCGS from my experience.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10982 Posts |
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,154 |
|
Posted 05/20/2016 1:07 pm
