Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsJoin Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1964 SMS Cent? Why Or Why Not?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 4,379Next Topic  
Valued Member

United States
96 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2016  05:55 am Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add 1966ddr to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
If it's the 1964 SMS, tell me why; if it's not, why not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?

1964-SMS-Cent?-Why-Or-Why-Not?
Pillar of the Community
Biedercoins's Avatar
United States
1602 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2016  05:59 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Biedercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not sharp enough devices, fields not uniformly satin [I originally said reflective which is wrong] enough. I've got rolls of brand new '64s that are better candidates than that one. IMHO.
Edited by Biedercoins
07/20/2016 11:33 am
Valued Member
United States
96 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2016  06:21 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1966ddr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
To Biedercoins, am I to understand that if an SMS coin were to be on circulation it can not lose its luster nor sharpness? Thanks for your response
Pillar of the Community
Biedercoins's Avatar
United States
1602 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2016  07:39 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Biedercoins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
1964 SMS lincoln cents are Extremely rare. They're almost mythic. The last I heard, there was a total of 22 registered with PCGS. They're like proofs in their execution, but they have a satin finish rather than a typical mirror proof. I don't know if anyone can agree on why they were even struck; experimental? The 65-67 SMS coins actually replaced proof and mint sets for those years and they were nice and shiny.

Both Mint and Proof sets were produced in 1964; and in pretty good numbers as that. Am I to understand your SMS candidate coin came from circulation? What about this particular specimen makes you think it's a SMS issue?
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2016  11:49 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
If it is a coin struck with a fresh die and low in mintage it would show no die wear. This coin is obviously a near LDS when you coin was struck. It is just a normal business struck coin.
Valued Member
United States
96 Posts
 Posted 07/20/2016  1:32 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add 1966ddr to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thanks a bunch.
  Previous TopicReplies: 5 / Views: 4,379Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.25 seconds to rattle this change. Forums