| Author |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,127 |
|
Valued Member
United States
69 Posts |
What do you think PCGS graded this one? High AU or MS? I think it's a tricky one for sure.  
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
I'd grade it at AU-58 but I'm guessing PCGS said MS-62 RB. Insanely nice coin 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36844 Posts |
I agree with ChildOfTheWheat, looks AU-58 to me but PCGS more than likely gave it a 62RB or 63RB
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
19966 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4085 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
I would grade it as AU58. PCGS will market grade it to MS62RB.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
69 Posts |
no one has guessed correctly so far.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
United States
441 Posts |
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
69 Posts |
nobody guessed this one correctly, PCGS graded it MS-65 RB 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
724 Posts |
65 will have above average luster. The picture does not tell the story. It must be a weak strike (PCGS believes)
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
Rough rims and numerous hits both sides . IMHO ,PCGS dropped the ball on this one . 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5828 Posts |
Certainly does have a clean obverse field and it does look very nice, however the reverse at least in the photos, is weak with a few marks and some rubbing. Might just be the photos?
Nice coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18696 Posts |
although nice, I definitely would not pay MS65 price for this one
|
| |
Replies: 16 / Views: 2,127 |