| Author |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,572 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
705 Posts |
Here is my final 1882-O/S variety(VAM-5) for your grading: I think the luster is a little better than showing in the pics.  Thanks
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36746 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5825 Posts |
Maybe even AU-58. Surfaces look original.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8137 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18670 Posts |
i think its a little short of 58 mainly do to the amount of remaining luster so I'm at AU55 also
|
|
Valued Member
United States
130 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12057 Posts |
Luster is a bit muted but it is clean enough that I could see it in a TPG AU58.
Member ANA - EAC - TNA - SSDC - CCT #890 "Most of the things worth doing in the world had been declared impossible before they were done." -- Louis D. Brandeis
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
705 Posts |
I guess we'll find out. I am sending it, along with a couple others, for grading and VAM ID. Hope to have the results in about 4wks. Thanks for your input here.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
11922 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4932 Posts |
Too much breast wear to make AU-58.
AU-55.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
2125 Posts |
I'm at AU-58 at least. Great original looking coin!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1316 Posts |
I'm at AU55. I love the color, but seems to have a little too much wear in the high points of the hair and feathers. Good luck with the TPG!
|
| |
Replies: 12 / Views: 1,572 |
|