I have an opinion question for the community.
I will preface by saying that I don't know if the buyer is a member of this community, but if he is, I mean no harm, I am only trying to hear other's opinion on our recent transaction.
I bought this coin (with intention to resell) from a dealer at a show and listed it on
ebay for a buy-it-now. I accepted a best offer for $45, despite the fact that I was taking a loss on it simply because coins seem more valuable at a show than in the real world.
http://www.ebay.com/itm/1877-CC-Dim...AOSwFV9XxLPyI take pride in my listings and honesty, and I nearly always accept returns. this coin was sold with a 30 day return policy, money back, buyer pays return shipping.
I was very surprised to get a return request from the buyer that read
"This coin is heavily damaged with Rolled Rims . The Edge Reeding was crushed in the past and now the reeding is gone and the coin has a smaller diameter. This coin is no good now"
The Reason: Doesn't match description or photos
I accepted the return and paid the shipping, because- what choice do I have. But I was insulted, and felt taken advantage of.
So, here is the opinion question:
Obviously, without seeing the edges, you couldn't say about the damage. Suppose it is exactly as the buyer claims for I have no reason to assume ill-intent on his part. (Though I didn't notice it when I bought it or sold it)
Is this listing SNAD? Or is this buyer abusing the right of claiming SNAD? Should they have just requested a return and not demanded the return shipping, and causing my defect rate to go up?
Please share your thoughts.