Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Specializing in Modern Numismatics Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

1994 Quarter Struck On Foreign/Wrong Planchet?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 4,388Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
johnnysprawl's Avatar
Canada
1618 Posts
 Posted 10/24/2016  11:04 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add johnnysprawl to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
3.8 grams; 21.5 mm diameter; magnetic.
The rim is only reeded where you can see the actual raised rim.

I figured there were 2 options:

1. Struck on a foreign planchet; however, I couldnt find anything on the coinscan.com website that matched either the year or the weight.

2. Struck on a Canadian nickel planchet, as it more closely matches the weight and diameter (3.9 g; 21.2 mm - 2003 to present nickels).

The diameter of the 1994 quarter is slightly larger than a nickel tho...

1994-Quarter-Struck-On-Foreign/Wrong-Planchet?

1994-Quarter-Struck-On-Foreign/Wrong-Planchet?
Pillar of the Community
clairhardesty's Avatar
United States
1027 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2016  01:06 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add clairhardesty to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It would be larger than a nickel because a proper nickel has its diameter set by the collar. A nickel planchet in a quarter collar would almost certainly end up larger then a nickel.
Pillar of the Community
Numisma's Avatar
United States
4963 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2016  09:41 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Numisma to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
It would be larger than a nickel because a proper nickel has its diameter set by the collar. A nickel planchet in a quarter collar would almost certainly end up larger then a nickel.

A nickel planchet between quarter dies would also pick up some of the reeding as it expanded if was near the edge, like this one.
Although the coin certainly hasn't lost much mass due to wear, the 0.1 g difference is probably within the margin of error or can be attributed to a slightly inaccurate scale.
Could we please see some pics of the edge?

Bedrock of the Community
GR58's Avatar
United States
11951 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2016  11:37 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GR58 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Very nice error coin.

If this was a US quarter ... it would be worthy of having it slabbed.

I would be leaning toward it being minted on a nickel planchet.

First thing I would suggest. Do a web search for quarter on a nickel.
Maybe you can compare how other identified errors look.
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10456 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2016  12:15 pm  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
My guess it is on a foreign planchet. Canadian 5-cent coins were struck on non-magnetic Cu-Ni planchets at that time.

The Royal Canadian Mint did not strike a lot of coins of that weight and finish in the 1990s, it could be:

Czech Republic 2 Korun planchet (nickel-plated steel) from 1993 or 1994 - most likely candidate

Botswana 10 Thebe planchet (nickel-plated steel) from 1991 - possible, but unlikely given the 1994 date


An XRF of the coin's composition would be a good start to confirm if it is indeed plated steel.
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
johnnysprawl's Avatar
Canada
1618 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2016  2:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add johnnysprawl to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Right, my mistake, I was comparing it to 2003-present nickels when I should have been looking at 1994 nickels.

My 1994 quarter likely wasnt struck on a 1994 nickel, as the nickel weight is greater (4.6 g), and, like SPP mentioned, is non-magnetic (being comprised of 75% copper and 25% nickel).

I did look up the Czech 2 Korun, but it looks like it was 11-sided?
Pillar of the Community
Scissel's Avatar
Canada
693 Posts
 Posted 10/25/2016  9:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Scissel to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
I did look up the Czech 2 Korun, but it looks like it was 11-sided?


Not before being minted. It would start out as a round planchet and the sides would be shaped by the collar die.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 4,388Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums