The reason we know it is not a mint error is this: When the blank was cut it was smooth on both edges(Type 1). Then the blank is put through an upset process that makes a rim on both edges (Type 2) Then the coin is struck with the dies and the coin is complete. With the reverse rim removed and devices, they were done after the coin was struck. Possibly with the above mentioned process, but the result is the same, it wasn't minted that way. (Post mint damage) Why would someone do this? To deceive others or another reason. To make a love token. This was done more so on 19th. Century coins. removing the the reverse and placing initials or events and kept for mementos. They usually used silver coins, but who know why they did it to a Cent? Only the defacer knows for sure. We can just speculate.
Edited by coop
03/18/2008 6:39 pm