Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsVancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Specializing in Modern Numismatics Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. 300,000 items to help build your collection! Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Republic Of China 1934 ¥1 - Some Questions

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,942Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 02/14/2017  5:45 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I acquired this last week from a reputable dealer with whom I deal regularly (this being in person, not online). He had gotten it as part of an older collection, in which it was actually misidentified as a 1933 when in fact it's dated 1934.

Republic-Of-China-1934--¥1---Some-Questions

Republic-Of-China-1934--¥1---Some-Questions

This particular design replaced the 1932 version that had three birds flying over the junk, and a sunrise (set?) to the right. That coin, even with well over 2 million made, is considered a bonafide rarity that at auction can fetch five figures. For this succeeding variety, despite really enormous mintages (over 46 million in 1933 and almost 129 million in 1934, plus another 30 million produced by the U.S. Mint in 1949 of the 1934 dated ones) they nevertheless also tend to be a little bit on the pricey side in mint state, say, $100 and up. Are they in fact scarce relative to the quantity struck? Was there an abnormally high rate of attrition that would account for this? I can't find any material that relates the history of this issue in sufficient detail to gain an understanding of what factors contribute to its substantial present day valuation. I also don't know how or if the later U.S. struck ones (for Taiwan, I presume) can be differentiated from the 1934 Chinese made ones.

As often happens with coins rhat carry even a modest numismatic premium, the type appears to be fairly frequently counterfeited. I don't actually have too much concern about the authenticity of my example - it weighs in at 26.58 grams against an official specification of 26.71 grams, albeit I believe my example's slightly oversized at 39.5 mm in diameter. I can't find any reason to doubt that it's made of silver, although I also note a discrepancy in the silver content among various sources, some stating it ought to be .900 fine, others only .880, and I've no idea which is correct.

Colligo ergo sum
Valued Member
silverai's Avatar
Canada
117 Posts
 Posted 02/15/2017  3:25 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silverai to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The coin shows Yr23 = 1934

So many fake coins in the market b/c the profit margin is very high. Bullion value for silver dollar is around $10USD but the market price is $60 to $xx,000. Cheap quality fake coins use copper alloy + plated silver, high quality fake coins use real sterling silver. Unless you know the old Chinese coins very well, otherwise, I won't recommend people buying the coins, especially silver dollars.
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/15/2017  6:06 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Lucky Cuss While you may have hit a genuine example chances are not great even from a reputable dealer.

If you read Kann's 1954 book on Chinese silver coins you can get an idea for where all of the originals went. They were melted wholesale to dispose of silver bullion. So mintage figures are essentially worthless. Auction appearances and tables of grades encapsulated is a better indication.

Silver numismatic forgeries are a problem so actual silver is also no guarantee.


Initial tests I would start with:

1. Is the coin magnetic? If it is FAKE.
2. Weight? If it weighs outside a range of 26.4 - 26.7 grams be extremely suspicious.
3. Density? 10.30 no deviation. Become suspicious at 10.29 or lower. Fake at 10.20 down.
4. XRF? 90% silver 10% copper rounded to nearest 1 %. If XRF accurate for trace (20ppm) NO RARE EARTH elements or materials used for electric conductivity additives.

Finally check the edge closely - you are looking for a collared strike - not a ring die or parallel bar die application. No overlaps, no two or three part collar dies
no split top reeds, no split tail reeds.
Edited by swamperbob
02/15/2017 6:08 pm
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 02/15/2017  8:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
If you read Kann's 1954 book on Chinese silver coins you can get an idea for where all of the originals went. They were melted wholesale to dispose of silver bullion. So mintage figures are essentially worthless.


I'm not familiar with that book, but you've answered one of my questions.


Quote:
Is the coin magnetic?


Not in the least.


Quote:
Weight? If it weighs outside a range of 26.4 - 26.7 grams be extremely suspicious.


As I said, it comes in at 26.58 grams.


Quote:
Finally check the edge closely - you are looking for a collared strike - not a ring die or parallel bar die application. No overlaps, no two or three part collar dies no split top reeds, no split tail reeds.


The reeding is gorgeous - absolutely no splits or overlaps whatsoever.

Determining its specific gravity probably wouldn't be as conclusive for authentication as an analysis via xray fluorescence, but that latter procedure have to wait for now.

Just for giggles, here's the 2x2 it came in -

Republic-Of-China-1934--¥1---Some-Questions

Not that it should be taken to prove anything, but it's suggestive that the coin was originally bought qute some time back.

Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss
02/16/2017 08:10 am
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/15/2017  9:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The price on the holder is reflective of a market that is decades old. I pay more than that for decent forgeries.
Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2017  6:59 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Since the subject of the edge reeding was brought up, I thought I ought to post a picture showing what it looks like.

Republic-Of-China-1934--¥1---Some-Questions

As I said earlier, it's very uniform all the way around, so if there were any overlaps, then the segments meshed more perfectly than would seem feasible.

Does the appearance of the reeding give anybody a basis upon which to opine as to whether this specimen is a true 1934 Chinese issue or from the 1949 U.S. Mint restriking?

Colligo ergo sum
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/17/2017  7:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Lucky cuss The reeding certainly looks better than the typical forgery. I would need to do some research to tell the reeding type. However, the Chinese did own an old press purchased from the US mint at Philadelphia so perhaps the collar might have come from the same source. If I find anything definitive I will write.




Pillar of the Community
Lucky Cuss's Avatar
United States
4883 Posts
 Posted 02/22/2017  8:42 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Lucky Cuss to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
The reeding certainly looks better than the typical forgery.


If a fake, the coin as a whole is certainly as well executed as would seem humanly possible. I just can't find anything upon which to fault it, and I'm generally very suspicious about material of this nature.

Colligo ergo sum
Pillar of the Community
swamperbob's Avatar
United States
5362 Posts
 Posted 02/27/2017  11:38 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add swamperbob to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have checked my files - I find nothing genuine or counterfeit that seems to match the reed design exactly.
  Previous TopicReplies: 8 / Views: 1,942Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.3 seconds to rattle this change. Forums