This Claudius II error is intriguing as the offset seems to be about the same on each side, but there's quite a bit more rotation between the two strikes on the obverse. I can't account for why that should be so.
So far as I can surmise, the following Quintillus from the same era resides in a museum collection in Vienna. In this instance, the doubling appears to be confined to the obverse.
See: http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coinview/1...ype-specimen
So far as I can surmise, the following Quintillus from the same era resides in a museum collection in Vienna. In this instance, the doubling appears to be confined to the obverse.
See: http://www.ric.mom.fr/en/coinview/1...ype-specimen
Colligo ergo sum
Edited by Lucky Cuss
04/03/2017 2:01 pm
04/03/2017 2:01 pm
























