| Author |
 Replies: 15 / Views: 1,174 |
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
Here a 59-D 1DO-002 but it maybe an 1DO-001 What do think?     the mint mark looks a lot different with a 15X lop I know that this is a RPM that all that matter to me! and thanks for all the folks who made me seam to be a fool! Edited by amac44
04/19/2008 1:56 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Neither - it looks like a completely normal coin.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
14454 Posts |
can you tell us where you are seeing doubling at please because I don't see any (I am no cent expert but doubling should be doubling no matter what coin its on)and maybe I can look at that particular area and not be looking at the whole coin looking for something
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1952 Posts |
me too. I dont even see MD. I do see a hit on the bottom of the last 9 but thats nothing abnormal
Gary
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
I *almost* see a RPM slightly to the north of the mint mark, but that's all I can see.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
236 Posts |
Actually guys... take a closer look at the D. There's inside splitting to the S.E. & a completely separated N.W. corner of the D. Could be normal, though doesn't look like it. I know the 50's coins have a lot of isues. Just looks like a minor RPM to me.
|
|
Member
 United States
3242 Posts |
theres a D/D in the mint mark It just like the 1Do-002 at Bob Piazza site coppercoins.com  Edited by amac44
04/18/2008 10:16 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
914 Posts |
I'm disagreeing that this is the 1D0-002. That one only looks like a doubled eye.
I am agreeing with the inside splitting of the SE part of the mint mark.
If it's any of the RPMs listed, I'd guess the 1959D-1MM-040, but that one doesn't have the SE separation.
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
I will have to post a better one latter Vaslin how's this look?  Edited by amac44
04/18/2008 10:22 am
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7629 Posts |
Your coin is not 1959D-1DO-001 or 1959D-1DO-002. In fact it is not a doubled die at all.
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
as aways the same answer.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
What do you expect when you keep posting pictures of ordinary normal coins? Your belligerence in the matter is getting rediculous...
Edited by biokemist6
04/18/2008 1:57 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
The coin is not a doubled die.
With respect to RPMs, it is definitely NOT...001, 002, 003, 004, 005, 006, 007, 008, 009, 010, 013, 014, 015, 017, 018, 021, 022, 023, 024, 025 thru 030.
etc. etc. and so on...
This looks like a normal 1959 D cent where the mintmark rests in a slight depression due to the way the MM was added to the die.
And...This looks nothing like Bob Piazza's picture.
Please think about this and reflect on it. The guy (coppercoins) that has 54 different 1959 D RPMs posted on his website has said that he sees nothing unusual about the coin. He has an even better trained eye than I have and mine is darn good. To contradict his thoughts on these just makes no sense.
One thing to add is that your photos have become excellent over time and that makes it easier for us to see what the coin looks like.
Thanks,
Bill
Edited by foundinrolls
04/18/2008 2:24 pm
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1934 Posts |
Suggestion: I read what I read on the internet, particularly on forums where I'm hardly and nowhere near an expert on a subject/topic, as a resource of information, and try not to shoot the messenger.
Fact is, for me, that two things apply...it's up to each of us to determine the priority of them under which circumstances:
1. It's not what you say; but how you say it.
2. It's not how you say it; but what you say.
If anyone shoots me for yelling, shmoozing, crying, laughing, touchy-feely that 1+1=2, so be it. "1+1=2" is still a fact, regardless of how I express it.
|
|
Member
United States
3242 Posts |
So do I but this a family forum.
|
| |
Replies: 15 / Views: 1,174 |
|
Posted 04/17/2008 12:42 pm
