| Author |
 Replies: 28 / Views: 3,160 |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
Hi guys . Can you please rate this coin, Thanks in advance .   |
|
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
185 Posts |
au 55, the hight point on the obverse is slightly worn.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
AU-58, definitely saw a bit of circulation.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
693 Posts |
MS-63. The obverse did not strike-up fully - either from insufficient pressure in the press, or more likely the planchet was not annealed enough.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
987 Posts |
Looks no better than AU-58.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
955 Posts |
Dorado , hope you don't mind but I did this... Nice pic btw , x350  @Scissel  |
|
Bedrock of the Community
 Canada
24885 Posts |
@ Canacoins Quote:
Dorado , hope you don't mind but I did this... Of course not . |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
10743 Posts |
Light strike, looks mint state to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
I would expect to see more frosty luster on it for 63. Seems quite shiny..
Has any conservation treatment been applied to this nickel..?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 Canada
5594 Posts |
Lots of marks/dings and I see tiny spots of wear ... 55 at best.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
Quote:
Has any conservation treatment been applied to this nickel..? I'm looking very closely to the right reverse leaf just below the "S" in CENTS. I clearly see a faint luster around the leaf in the protected area near that leaf. This coin might have been polished..and is just too shiny for any accurate grading..IMHO |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
Quote:
Has any conservation treatment been applied to this nickel..? None. |
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
Quote:
I'm looking very closely to the right reverse leaf just below the "S" in CENTS.
I clearly see a faint luster around the leaf in the protected area near that leaf.
This coin might have been polished..and is just too shiny for any accurate grading..IMHO I think you are wrong .  |
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
I wouldn't say they're wrong given the first pictures given. The reverse has a polished appearance lacking in luster in the first image, while the second image clearly shows the luster is most certainly there mostly undisturbed.
So I say the au58 - ms62 range is likely fair imo.
This series of nickels almost never shows up for grades on here, good to show the for sharing opinion, even though the values arent high.
Edited by Alan
07/29/2017 10:05 pm
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
3234 Posts |
BTW..The last 62 pic is now a different coin..
...and a nicer coin with original a frosty original surface.
Need the obverse pic though to give this newer addition a grade..
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1463 Posts |
Yes that's right, it is a different coin, what a waste of people's time. dorado is trolling, you tricked me but simply on good faith, that's quite sad.
|
| |
Replies: 28 / Views: 3,160 |
Posted 07/21/2017 5:12 pm
