Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer 300,000 items to help build your collection! Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Specializing in Modern Numismatics








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Mis-Identified Coins A Mistake Or Intentional?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 14 / Views: 1,849Next Topic  
New Member

United States
23 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  3:35 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add marcomsf to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I saw today a coin presented as a 1946 S inverted mint mark attributed by a well known coin grading service. This particular issue is my personal favorite and I have many examples in my collection. The ebay seller has sold thousands of coins and I was initially hesitant to point out that I believed it was mis-identified. I challenge any reader of this post to search the specimen and respond whether I am off base with this observation.
Has this grading company's standards diminished or is someone asleep at the wheel?
Robert
Pillar of the Community
silverwolf's Avatar
Canada
3733 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  3:45 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add silverwolf to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
have you got the item number,
New Member
United States
23 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  4:15 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add marcomsf to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Valued Member
oleg212's Avatar
Canada
66 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  5:11 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add oleg212 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
it sure is a high grade................but I don't think it's worthy of MS65
New Member
United States
23 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  5:52 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add marcomsf to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
The grade is not important,
the specific attribute is what I call attention to.
Any other serious collectors opine?

Presuming my analysis of this specific coin is correct and it is Not an IMM-001, FS-501 then two thoughts remain;

The coin is an outright fake or,
It has been grossly mis-identified.(by a highly "reputable" company)

reference Lincoln Cent Resource SF Mintmark styles for the 1946 issue,
Ball serif mintmark.
Pillar of the Community
Bump111's Avatar
United States
3323 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  6:34 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Bump111 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
First,

I opened up the listing, but I couldn't get the image very clear when zoomed. At first glance, it looks like the ball serif S. So, if it is, couldn't it only be the inverted MM? I'm no expert of this variety. Maybe the ones more knowledgeable will chime in
"Nummi rari mira sunt, si sumptus ferre potes." - Christophorus filius Scotiae
Rest in Peace
moxking's Avatar
United States
17900 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  7:17 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add moxking to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm on a tablet, so I'm limited on size, but I agree that it doesn't look right from what I can see.

However, when I compare my own abilities to those who do identification for a profession and have held the coin in their hands ill usually believe the professional first.

It's not to say mistakes don't happen, but is to say that me looking at a third hand photo isn't cause for me to doubt such an identification.
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  9:22 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with OP. Use reference 1946S-1MM-025 on coppercoins.com which pictures a " Ball Serif" mint mark having two balls(like most of us...oops!). Notice the thinning along the upper curve is a match for listed coin.

What confuses most is the THREE styles used, Serif(one ball), sans serif(smooth) and ball serif(two balls).

Is not the reversed mm have thinning at bottom? I don't know myself.
New Member
United States
23 Posts
 Posted 08/23/2017  9:53 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add marcomsf to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Only one mintmark was inverted, the Ball serif. Even PCGS variety listing for this issue is in conflict with the advertised specimen despite the attribute. Have referred this to an actual expert for interpretation. Will hope to report back soon, meanwhile happy hunting!
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 08/24/2017  1:05 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I don't know the variety well enough to comment as to whether or not it is right, but I have been saying for over 25 years to never trust the variety attributions by the top two grading services. They have gotten a lot better but are still wrong about 10% of the time. On oledr slabs it could be 50% of the time or more. PCGS just recently began guaranteeing their attributions, NGC does not.
Rest in Peace
Parklane64's Avatar
United States
2668 Posts
 Posted 08/24/2017  2:30 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Parklane64 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Welcome,marcomsf! Indeed, it is wonderful when the expertise concentrated in this forum gets added to.

Don't fade on us! There is much valuable information available in the bar to the left < which is free to access. I look forward to your future posts!

My area of specialty is chocolate coins.

New Member
United States
23 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2017  01:07 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add marcomsf to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Advantage of chocolate coins to me is that their state will remain the same within the grade, sometimes red coins due to various reasons can degrade in both grade and color, agree? Unless you are referencing chocolate chocolate coins? #128523;
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2017  08:47 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
He means chocolate chocolate coins.
Pillar of the Community
edweather's Avatar
United States
7375 Posts
 Posted 08/26/2017  11:02 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add edweather to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I agree with OP. It looks like a regular ball serif mm. PCGS has a couple of nice examples where you can download full size image and zoom in. Looks like PCGS messed up.

http://images.PCGS.com/CoinFacts/31...7426_max.jpg
Pillar of the Community
edweather's Avatar
United States
7375 Posts
 Posted 08/28/2017  10:33 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add edweather to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It could also be a shadow at the bottom of the mint mark keeping us from seeing it clearly.
  Previous TopicReplies: 14 / Views: 1,849Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.32 seconds to rattle this change. Forums