| Author |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,462 |
|
|
New Member
8 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
Too many coin! One or two at a time! Please! #1 is acid bath, damaged, no value. Only one that is a true error of value is #2 the offset, @$10 since has date, but isn't in very good shape, protect it. #3 LWC is damaged PMD. Post mint damage, not a clipped planchet, no value #4 is "road rash" spent time in parking lot #5&6...? Normal stinkin zinkin cents, left has fingerprint toning, right looks like plating blisters, zinc rot zits. Only the offset is a mint error, all others are just damaged coins. Read up on what is and isn't an error coin, and I don't mean the get rich quick on coins books either. Try the one below.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1901 Posts |
Crazy that last 1983 on the right was Struck Through Grease or over polished on the neck wasn't it? And couldn't that first one be an underweight planchet what gives it away that it's acid? Just wondering
|
|
New Member
 8 Posts |
Sorry for too many pictures, was just trying to avoid making too many new posts. The first coin is super slick to the touch, almost like those flattened fish tank marbles and super shiny. I have quite a few 1983 Lincoln no necks, that's why I was wondering what it could be. As soon as I found the offset one it has been in its own separate casing. Sorry again but thank you for the help crazybo
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7516 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3058 Posts |
The only errors I am seeing are the off center and the no neck. Everything else is damage. Great finds! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
What is the weight of the 1982 cent?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Good eye, agree one coin at a time please.   to the CCF!
|
|
New Member
 8 Posts |
Thanks again guys and I'll get better pictures next time.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
It would be nice to see the edge where the devices are the weakest. I'm wondering if it is thinner on the top of the obverse/bottom of the reverse? If the devices were thinned by polishing or missing metal? (making it lighter) If the weight is close to normal it maybe a polished coin that weakened some of the devices.
|
| |
Replies: 9 / Views: 1,462 |
|