Got on
ebay in 2000. Never even saw Canadian colonial tokens before that. Starting buying a lot of el cheapos, and got hooked on Tiffins and 1832's. I had the 2000 token book and eventually found something that was different and I asked about it on a now defunct coin site, and it was discussed as an error only. It was the die clash of "TOKEN" on the 1832 imitation halfpenny, NS-3A2.
Soon after, the 2010 Charlton edition came out and listed this as NS-3A4, with the die clash listed as the difference from A2. Drat, the book was in the works when I had inquired about it so someone found the variety before me.
I search all the time for these and have come up with 7, the costliest was $27 ! I marked all as NS-3A4 on the 2x2's. Recently I was having another look and realized that on 2 of the 7, the die clash was different from the one shown in the Charlton book. The original clash has the ghost KOT to the left sides of TIA The 2 I found have the ghost K under the T and the other ghost OT to the right of IA.
The 2 clashes are obviously different so could this be reason enough to designate this as a new variety or a sub-variety, changing the listings to NS-3A4 and A5, or 3A4a and 3A4b ? I'd settle for a sub, extra mayo.
Charlton listed clash in 1st picture, different one in 2nd.





