| Author |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,356 |
|
Valued Member
United States
234 Posts |
I was digging around cleaning when I came across six Buffalo nickels I must have gotten when I was a wee lad. I have a few questions about them as I am by no means an expert on these things. 1. are they even real? Not a single one of these Nickels have a date on them anywhere, is this simply due to their age or something different? 2. Almost all of also seem to have some sort of stamping error in the upper right corner of them (not sure how well that translated through the pictures let me know if I need to post better ones.) is this assumption correct if not what is it? 3. If the answer to question 2 is yes, does this error make them more valuable if so by how much? Any advice that can be offered on this matter would be greatly appreciated Thanks in advance.  This the best example of the stamping error (off-center stamp?) the rest of them have a similar thing in the same place just a lesser degree.  *** Moved by Staff to a more appropriate forum. ***Edited by Webster 01/05/2018 2:24 pm
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
827 Posts |
They are just well worn Buffalo nickels. They once had a date but it has worn off.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5029 Posts |
Dateless Buffalo nickles are not uncommon at all from being very worn. Can you post a picture of the "stamping error" you are referencing.
Edited by scopru 01/05/2018 12:59 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
Edited in a closeup of the error upper right corner.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1101 Posts |
Quote: Can you post a picture of the "stamping error" you are referencing I'm wondering if he's referencing the wider rim edge in the picture, around the forehead area of the face
Edited by shotgung 01/05/2018 1:33 pm
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
yes that is correct Shotgung.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
That's the area where the word LIBERTY was but now worn down to create that wide rim . Can you show us photos of the other side of those Nickels ? 
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
T-BOP thank you that makes a lot of sense I can still make LIBERTY out on a few of them, also added a picture of the reverse.
|
|
Rest in Peace
10197 Posts |
The date area and liberty are actually higher in the design than the rim. They were the first to wear out. The 1913 original design on the reverse had the Five cents on a raised area but was changed immediately to the sunken type because it wore away too quick. Why they didn't do the date...?
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
There were two type on the 1913 Nickels. So if you have the type 1 reverse then it is 1913 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
 to the CCF!
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
Were these multiple types of mintage exclusive to 1913? if so would that be a way to confirm that they are from 1913 or at least narrow it down a bit?
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
17900 Posts |
1913 is the only date for 2 types. See above the two types. The mound type is the first type.
Look on the reverse for D or S for mint marks. An S, even if very worn, is worth a few bucks if type one.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
I enlarged the photo of the reverses and it looks like - maybe - there might be a 1913. The last two in the bottom row look like the buffalo is standing on a mound. But we really need a close-up of each coin.
|
|
Valued Member
 United States
234 Posts |
I just gave each a closer look and none of them are standing on a mound, (now that I figured out the difference) I can say that with as much confidence as a novice to buffalo's is able. Thank you for pointing that out though I learned something today.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
7075 Posts |
Aw, that's too bad. I was hopeful for a little while.
I have a little jar of dateless buffalos. I know they'll never be worth any more than five cents but ... well, there they are. I can't bring myself to get rid of them.
|
| |
Replies: 23 / Views: 2,356 |