Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Estate Auctions - $1 Coin AuctionsCoin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection!








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

2001 D LMC Expert Advice On This One Please!

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 2,618Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5239 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2018  9:25 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
I found this 2001 D LMC that is extra thick and weighs 2.5g and is exactly the same thickness and rim squareness as a proof cent. It also has the same mirror finish as a proof except for the frosting on the lettering, bust and memorial on the reverse. I have included a side by side with a 1998 S proof cent as well as a side by side with another 2001 D LMC. Insight as to whether this could possibly be a proof planchet and if so how could it have been minted in Denver? I've seen square rimmed Lincoln cents and have a lot of them but NOTHING like this.
2001-D-LMC-Expert-Advice-On-This-One-Please!
2001-D-LMC-Expert-Advice-On-This-One-Please!
2001-D-LMC-Expert-Advice-On-This-One-Please!
2001-D-LMC-Expert-Advice-On-This-One-Please!
Edited by Jim0815
04/05/2018 9:41 pm
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2018  11:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
It could just be a first series run on a brand new die with all the factors firing on all cylinders...not the standard it seems for the US Mint!. A fully adjusted die set and correct pressure gives the equilibrium needed for uniformity. Note just how far the details are from the rim, no die flow has taken effect yet for these to begin to migrate outwards, the letters are crisp and yes the rim is sharper than a normal run, I have also noticed that before, could have sworn it was a proof. It can't be a mixup, wrong die to Denver, they stopped making all the dies in Philly by then. That's why I say a brand new die, the first couple hundred made before wear set in, polishing needed and adjustment to the die holders. I remember last year sending one to a fellow CCFer saying "Look at this, a proof"!
Edited by Crazyb0
04/05/2018 11:05 pm
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3655 Posts
 Posted 04/05/2018  11:49 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply


Cent planchets for the Denver mint are outsourced to Jarden Zinc Company, which is actually the successor to the company that made Ball Mason jars. They arrive as finished planchets, and are struck without annealing.

In 2001, Denver was still using the Bliss presses, which vertically struck four coins at a time. The different die pairs could have widely different lifespans. (I think Denver switched to the horizontal Schuler presses in 2004 or 2005. The switch came after the 2004 Wisconsin quarter debacle.)

The older Bliss presses could handle a wider tolerance than the Schuler presses. My guess - and it is only a guess - is that the contractor was allowed slightly greater planchet tolerance before 2004 or 2005. The combination of the thicker planchet and a new die pair likely explain your coin.

Many of us in the Front Range noted the mirror-like surfaces of the new Denver Zincolns in the late 1990s and early 2000s. I recall seeing some variance in the thickness back then, but not as great as your coin.
Edited by fortcollins
04/05/2018 11:51 pm
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  12:17 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
During the 1997-2000 era the edges were taller. You could feel the differences even through a 2X2. But it is just the rim that was affected. Just normal weight. Not proofs. But this did not happen to all of them. Just a few I found in OBW rolls. I saved a few, but no premium attached to them.
Bedrock of the Community
Learn More...
spru's Avatar
United States
12477 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  01:46 am  Show Profile   Check spru's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add spru to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@Jim0815

Can you clarify what coin is which in the last two pics?
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020
In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020
In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  04:42 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Not a proof. The wide edge is usually the result of a bit too much pressure during striking.
John1
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5239 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  06:27 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
@spruett001, in the third pic the 1998 S is the coin on top and the 2001 D is on the bottom. The 2001d is the coin on the right and the normal 2001d ison the left.
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5239 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  06:34 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I want to thank you all for taking your time and giving me some insight as to what may have caused this cent to be in the first place. @fortcollins, the information you gave me is priceless and I agree with you in that I've seen and have wide rimmed cents but nothing on this scale. I do have a question, who supplied the proof planchet sheets to San Francisco that same year?
Edited by Jim0815
04/06/2018 08:51 am
Pillar of the Community
fortcollins's Avatar
United States
3655 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  6:51 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add fortcollins to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Jim0815, sorry, I don't know who (if anybody) supplies cent planchets to San Francisco. Also, coop is spot on about the squared rims during this era.
Bedrock of the Community
coop's Avatar
United States
62064 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  9:29 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add coop to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I'm guessing the proof planchets are probably from the same source. But I've not read any information on that fact yet.
Pillar of the Community
Jim0815's Avatar
United States
5239 Posts
 Posted 04/06/2018  11:44 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Jim0815 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Thank you Mr. Coop.
  Previous TopicReplies: 10 / Views: 2,618Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.35 seconds to rattle this change. Forums