| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 2,203 |
|
|
New Member
United States
39 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74717 Posts |
Nope, I don't think so. I don't see full completion of the steps, so I say it isn't a Full Step Nickel.
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Rest in Peace
United States
18456 Posts |
 not full steps . 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
318 Posts |
I've sent in several 1960s nickels to PCGS. What will hurt your chances is the far left side of your steps, the lines don't go all the way to the edge. And there is a lot of bridging going on between your lower steps. I've read on other forums and it seems to be a heated topic on what is truly full steps. The grading services count steps as if you are walking them down, starting at the very top where the door is. If I walk your steps down, I stepped 5 times as the bottom most line counts as you stepped over it. So, that is 5 steps. I think they might cut you some slack on the far left lines not going all the way to the edge but that bridging on the 3rd step is what will hurt your chances.
Some of the debates I've seen included hard-core coin guys who also appear to have a degree in architecture as they had referenced photos to the actual steps of Monticello where there is a grass lawn up at the top, below the door. Regardless, it is the bed the grading services made for themselves on how they chose to grade these things and as long as their grading remains consistent over the years and hasn't changed, what they choose to be 5FS or 6FS is what it is.
The big problem I see is that regardless of your getting lucky with a designation of FS or not, the day you go to sell it, the buyers may not be so enthused to bid on your nickel. Most all of the auction site photos are from a camera view dead overtop of the coin. If it doesn't look like a well defined FS nickel at that angle, you're probably not going to get big dollars for it.
With all that being said, if it were me and I had that nickel, I'd send it in anyway. Your date is 1965 which puts you right at the base of PCGS "modern" service at $16. If you don't get FS, your cost was only $16 +shipping. If you do get FS and they feel it's a high priced nickel, well, it hasn't happened to me yet but they are supposed to invoice you for 1% of price guide value as you had opted for the lowest priced grading service which only covers up to $300 in book value. BTW -- I have two 1965 nickels (1 regular strike and 1 SMS) at PCGS right now, expecting to know something by the end of next week.
Good luck!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
2224 Posts |
 nada, don't see it from the photos Good luck with your submissions Mike, let us know 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
Agree.  to the CCF!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
318 Posts |
I think that nickel will grade well. I'm no grading expert but at minimum MS65 as that thing looks nicer that what I've gotten back as MS65s. Probably MS66. Look at Jefferson's face. No deep marks, clean. I almost thought it was from an SMS set at first, maybe it is. Having almost full steps will get you the higher grade based on a strong strike. Very nice for a 1960s nickel.
|
|
New Member
 United States
39 Posts |
The reason I was thinking it would be a good idea to send it in is because of the examples I compared it to from PCGS. A lot of the photos I looked at In their website confused me more than I already am lol. I mean some of them just don't seem anything close to being full steps imo. I took some screenshots of a few them, I'll post them here if anyone cares to see what I'm talking about..
|
|
New Member
 United States
39 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I wouldn't call any of those full steps.
|
|
New Member
 United States
39 Posts |
Exactly.. and there's a whole lot more that are similiar and even worse than the ones I just posted. I think that this nickel could grade really high also . I just had a 1964 nickel come back after sending it to PCGS for grading, it came back graded a ms 65. It was no where close to being as lustrous and appealing to the eye. The strike was also no where near complete as this 65 and it doesn't have near the amount of bag marks or Hair line scratches the 1964 did.. I wished you guys could see it in person instead of by iPhone pics. I've had a really tough time trying to get a picture that does it justice. I don't expect tru view quality pics but it's the best I could manage with what I have. I've got a side by side comparison with another guys 1965 nickel that has some super nice steps for reference. Some of you guys probly know him but he's a guru when it comes to knickels and full steps. I learned a ton just by reading his posts on different forums and on his website but here is his 1965 nickel  
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
When I go to the PCGS examples, I wonder how people collect these. Seems like there is no constancy of them. I get up trying. Same way on Bell lines on Franklin halves. Just don't care...
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3402 Posts |
Remember with the grading services there is not just one or two people grading these. Opinions vary and many just don't actually make the real grade. They have to generate income. Grade it yourself, not a FS Jeff. Would you buy some of those shown as FS Jeff's? If so you are buying the slab and not the coin.
KK
|
|
Valued Member
United States
318 Posts |
My PCGS grades are in. I should have the coins in hand probably on Friday. But Wow. I tanked on my 1960's "FS" nickels. I knew my 1960D was not FS but sent it in anyway. Based on other nickels I had previously graded, I was 96% sure what I sent were going to be FS. At least my estimated MS64 grade came in correct so I'm happy about that -- not for the value but for my ability to grade nickels is getting better. My 1965 Nickel steps were more clearly defined than what you have in your photo, I didn't get FS. I'll take a photo of it over the weekend so you can compare what just got rejected. In the chart below, under description "5C" are nickels. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
10038 Posts |
Another area where people seem to naturally expect a "science" to the designations, but will never get it with the current TPGs. What gets me is people will spend a lot of money on the label b/c it says FS, when the eyes can clearly see problems - if they take the time to look. Some of the pics you posted of certified FS designations show us all again why its smart to buy the coin and not the holder.
Some of those pics you posted just seem downright dishonest. These graders are supposed to be experts and yet those pics obviously show different.
How much squash could a Sasquatch squash if a Sasquatch would squash squash? Download and read: Grading the graders Costly TPG ineptitude and No FG Kennedy halveshttps://ln5.sync.com/dl/7ca91bdd0/w...i3b-rbj9fir2
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 2,203 |
|