Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Specializing in Modern Numismatics 300,000 items to help build your collection! Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes. Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

How Does A Proof Coin Get To Be Less Than 69/70?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,670Next Topic  
Pillar of the Community
Alpha2814's Avatar
United States
2023 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2018  1:11 pm Show Profile   Bookmark this topic Add Alpha2814 to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
In another thread, someone mentioned proof coins experiencing wear due to improper storage. When I think of "wear", I think of damage caused by handling, either in circulation or from other coins in the production/bagging process.

But proof coins generally don't get handled the same way. Most proof coins from recent years ("recent" here being the last 25 years, give or take) seem to be graded 69 or 70, while coins older than that are less than that. My set of Franklin proofs are all 66 (and not cameo).

Thinking mainly of these older coins, why are so many of them not graded higher? Were they not as well struck so they don't have full details? Is it a storage thing, although even my 66s don't have any visible spots or haze? And why are some of them (deep) cameo while others are not?

Modern coins have spoiled us with such high contrast cameo and near-perfect strikes. The difference in grades has been in front of me the whole time but I never seriously wondered why before this morning.
Moderator
Learn More...
John1's Avatar
United States
56855 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2018  1:16 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add John1 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
From what I have heard, it is the way the dies were prepared and the way the mint packaged and mailed the coins. Before 1978 cameos were few and far between. Each die set only struck a few deep cameos.
John1
Pillar of the Community
Finn235's Avatar
United States
6130 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2018  1:46 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Finn235 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I believe at grades above 65, things like centering and strike evenness come into play. Nowadays we have computers helping do all the hard work, so more coins are reaching the level of technical near-perfection.
Pillar of the Community
kanga's Avatar
United States
5825 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2018  4:14 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add kanga to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply

Quote:
Thinking mainly of these older coins, why are so many of them not graded higher? Were they not as well struck so they don't have full details? Is it a storage thing, although even my 66s don't have any visible spots or haze?

It's been a long time since I dealt with older proof coins in original packaging.
And I think that's the key here.
I don't recall proof coins from the Franklin era coming from the Mint in hard holder.
The softer, pliable cellophane(?)/polyvinyl(?) holders made it very easy for the coins to acquire unintentional handling marks.
Hence the lower grades.
Edited by kanga
09/21/2018 4:17 pm
Rest in Peace
Crazyb0's Avatar
10197 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2018  4:23 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Crazyb0 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Packaging. Pre 1966, all coin sets were mint cello for proof
coins. Some were even mailed in the mint envelope to the purchaser. Any pressure upon the coin in cello will cause pressure wear on high points. If a cello was pierced which happened a lot, or coin not handled correctly upon insertion(fingerprints). 1966 started the 5/6 coin plastic packaging which helped eliminate high point wear and many handling errors.
Pillar of the Community
Alpha2814's Avatar
United States
2023 Posts
 Posted 09/21/2018  7:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Alpha2814 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
That all makes sense. Thank you!
Bedrock of the Community
Conder101's Avatar
United States
17884 Posts
 Posted 09/23/2018  10:19 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Conder101 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
And don't forget that a lot of coins spent years not even in the mint packaging before slabbing came along. 2X2's capsules, albums with plastic slides, and being moved from one of these holders to another. Then someone sends it in for grading and al it's little flaws are discovered. Also in those older years the proofs WERE handled and packaged by hand, Chances for finger prints, being slid along a suerface etc. And the packaging room were not "clean rooms" so dust and contaminants could get on the coins and later cause spotting.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,670Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.23 seconds to rattle this change. Forums