| Author |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,223 |
|
|
Valued Member
Canada
314 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
11896 Posts |
looks 61 and may be pl or dmpl but hard to tell from pics. better than the others you have shown for sure.
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
314 Posts |
@numismatic_student, I've tried to do the appropriate tests, and I'm fairly sure it's a DMPL rather than a PL. But thank you, I've been trying to improve with you're guys' help
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
Does not look like a DMPL to me. John1 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
94367 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
36782 Posts |
Looks like circulation marks to me. AU-58 with PL surfaces.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
AU58 - The coin shows circulation. The obverse from your photos look like the mirror surface may have been cleaned, On coins with mirrors surfaces take the photo directly above the coin. Your photo is at an angle on the obverse. At PCGS, the coin would not get the PL or DMPL tag as the fields on the obverse have too much rub to display the necessary mirrors. The reverse is better than the obverse.
Edited by Slider23 09/30/2018 10:25 pm
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
18680 Posts |
when requesting PL qualities use newsprint so that depth can be determined
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
Here is a photo of a 78CC NGC AU Details improperly cleaned that had PL surfaces when minted. Your photo of the obverse reminded me of my coin that I had sold. 
|
|
Valued Member
United States
306 Posts |
Also for reference, here is a straight graded AU 55 with PL surfaces. 
|
|
Valued Member
 Canada
314 Posts |
The obverse is the same 
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,223 |
|