| Author |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,764 |
|
|
New Member
United States
1 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
5240 Posts |
 to the CCF! It appears as if the nickel cladding was removed. I have one just like it, different year. Worth face value.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
21642 Posts |
 To the CCF. Youare showing two pictures of the Obverse. can we see the Reverse?
|
|
Moderator
 United States
56855 Posts |
 to CCF. Looks like a previously buried coin,environmental damage. You need to name the photos differently. John1 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
Canada
24885 Posts |
 To the Forum.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189656 Posts |
 to the Community! Quote: can we see the Reverse? Fixed. 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
74886 Posts |
 To CCF! Just Environmental damage unfortunately. It's Post Strike Damage ( PSD).
Errers and Varietys.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34430 Posts |
@jesus111moon, first welcome to CCF. Second, if you accurately weigh this coin, you can determine whether it is environmental toning or the clad layer has been removed. Sorry but in either case, it is worth face value.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Valued Member
United States
366 Posts |
looks like a metal detector find - environmental damage
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
The weight should be normal if it is an outdoor find. If the cladding is missing, then the weight should be lighter. Also the strike would be a lot weaker if the cladding was removed.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3331 Posts |
It looks to me like your dime has environmental damage. Were it missing clad, weight would be less than normal. Dime weight missing one clad layer = 1.863 g +/- 0.091 g; missing two clad layers = 1.453 g +/- .161 g
|
| |
Replies: 10 / Views: 1,764 |
|