| Author |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,076 |
|
|
New Member
United States
13 Posts |
I have had this dime for years, Always wanted to know what the heck happened to it at the mint?  The two dimples or spots are blank on the reverse side The two don't match up Hope this is making sense The reeding on the rim only took have the area up Hope the pics will explain what I am trying to show you Also,, It looks silver, no clad color on the rim Thanks for looking Image: DSC02378.jpg51.3 KB Image: DSC02379.jpg59.63 KB Image: DSC02381.jpg46.67 KB Image: DSC02382.jpg55.02 KB Image: DSC02380.jpg23.46 KB Image: DSC02383.jpg17.27 KB Tim
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
526 Posts |
First, it should not be a clad. It is a silver dime; clad started in 1965. As to the dimples; they occurred outside the mint and it is considered a damaged coin. Thus, it is worth melt.
BJ Neff
|
|
Moderator
 United States
16677 Posts |
I agree. It appears to be post mint damage to the coin.
swcoin.ecrater.com
|
|
New Member
 United States
13 Posts |
Quote: First, it should not be a clad. It is a silver dime; clad started in 1965. As to the dimples; they occurred outside the mint and it is considered a damaged coin. Thus, it is worth melt.
BJ Neff
Hey,, Thanks for letting me know when they stopped Silver coins     I'm leaning I guess   Maybe these pics will help  Tim Image: DSC02384.jpg37.89 KB Image: DSC02385.jpg44.57 KB
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
Hi,
It is a 1969 D dime, It is a clad coin. It has been damaged. It is discolored. There is no way to be sure what damaged the coin but what you see is not something that occurred at the Mint.
Thanks, Bill
|
|
New Member
 United States
13 Posts |
|
|
New Member
United States
12 Posts |
It maybe one of the planchets that were made buy a subcontractor that didn't get the bid. If I remember right there was 5 contractors in the mix for the contract it was a 5 year contest for the contract 1965-1970.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Nothing happened to it at the Mint, it is just damage from something hitting it hard and pushing the metal through on the opposite side.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
341 Posts |
I have seen coins with similar bulges. They were exposed to fire.
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
It has been exposed to high heat, enough to soften the metal. If there are tiny bubbles of gas trapped in the metal or between the layers this gas when heated expands like a balloon causing the bulges on the surface. When cooled the metal solidifies in the bulged shape. In the case of the one on the back something pressed in the bulge before the metal solidified.
|
|
New Member
 United States
13 Posts |
Quote: Nothing happened to it at the Mint, it is just damage from something hitting it hard and pushing the metal through on the opposite side.
The spots are on different ends of the coin Tim
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
12437 Posts |
Oops, I notice that now, I posted before my morning caffeine  High heat can cause the clad layers to separate internally creating a "bubble" effect. I think the dent and gouge on the reverse is what threw me off- someone probably tried to poke the bubble with something causing it to cave in. The reeding area that is missing is where the edge of the copper core would be but it has eroded. Regardless, it is still post-mint damage.
|
|
New Member
 United States
13 Posts |
Thank you all for your time  Tim
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3507 Posts |
jello9984, Can you elaborate on your statement and indicate how planchets from a subcontractor would end up at the Mint, prior to a contract? You say....
" It maybe one of the planchets that were made buy a subcontractor that didn't get the bid. If I remember right there was 5 contractors in the mix for the contract it was a 5 year contest for the contract 1965-1970.
I would be curious to know more about this...
In any case, the bumps and dips on this coin have to have happened after the coin left the mint. This coin is damaged...
The coins are clad. Perhaps this one was heated . That would account for the bubble. Something else after the coin left the Mint would account for the depression.
Thanks, Bill
|
| |
Replies: 13 / Views: 1,076 |
|