| Author |
 Replies: 11 / Views: 1,329 |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3479 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7375 Posts |
Probably not alone, but looks natural to me.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1005 Posts |
It looks accidentally toned to me - an AT coin doctor would probably have done a better job on a coin of that caliber
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
683 Posts |
IMO something this would fall under the questionable color label.
It doesn't look like it was intended to deceive someone, but was probably left in undesirable conditions.
UNC details imo
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
7192 Posts |
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
4469 Posts |
The coin does not look natural, but I would not put the AT tag on the coin. I like toned coins, but I would pass on the OP coin.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
1267 Posts |
From the images, I don't care for this one, and I would imagine that cac didn't care for it either (although that may have more to do with actual grade than color).
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
5672 Posts |
It looks like the lighting is exaggerating the color. Not that attractive, but it might be natural, caused by some environmental conditions.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
3479 Posts |
It's important to take a look at the second set of pictures with the coin in the slab. I never look at the Heritage juiced-up pics that appear first. I've always felt that the second set of pics in the slaps are a more accurate representation of what the coin will look like in-hand.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
93 Posts |
It's natural, but very far gone.
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
8715 Posts |
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
17884 Posts |
I was thinking "Questionable" until I looked at the slab images. I think MikeF is probably right and the colors are exagerated in the coin only pictures.
|
| |
Replies: 11 / Views: 1,329 |
|
Posted 01/09/2019 9:28 pm
