Coin Community Family of Web Sites Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors
Vancouvers #1 Coin and Paper Money Dealer Shop for APMEX Bullion on eBay!300,000 items to help build your collection! Specializing in Modern Numismatics Coin, Banknote and Medal Collectors's Online Mall Join Thousands of Coin, Bullion, & Money Collectors Royal Canadian Mint products, Canadian, Polish, American, and world coins and banknotes.








Username:
Password:
Save Password
Forgot your Password?


This page may contain links that result in small commissions to keep this free site up and running.

Welcome Guest! Registering and/or logging in will remove the anchor (bottom) ads. It's Free!

Rolling Stock Or Strip Error?

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.
Author Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,569Next Topic  
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10458 Posts
 Posted 03/15/2019  8:04 pm Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this topic Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Message Number of Subscribers
This is a business strike 1973 nickel dollar. At first I through this was heavy rolling marks, but unlike every other nickel dollar that has rolling marks, this is only on the one side. So that would also rule out poorly annealed nickel strips too...

This one is a new one for me (at least with Canadian coins). This is definitely in the planchet, prior to the strike (and not post-mint damage), as it tends to almost disappear in the raised devices.

Something on the strip during the rolling of the nickel strips?

Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?
Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?
Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?
Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
GrapeCollects's Avatar
United States
8938 Posts
 Posted 03/15/2019  11:02 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add GrapeCollects to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Raised or incuse?
Pillar of the Community
Altaira's Avatar
Canada
2519 Posts
 Posted 03/15/2019  11:28 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Altaira to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
SPP, I have two nickel dollars that exhibit similar incused lines on one side only, although to a much lesser degree. You made me take a closer look. The first one I had brushed off as interesting PMD at the time, but now I have the same question. These are on two different coins, the first is on a 1975 and the second a 1974.

Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?
Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?

I can't get good enough close up pictures right now, I'll edit this post tomorrow when I do.

Edit:

Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?
Rolling-Stock-Or-Strip-Error?

Seems rather extreme to be rolling marks.
Edited by Altaira
03/16/2019 9:00 pm
Pillar of the Community
Phil310's Avatar
United States
1101 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2019  06:31 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add Phil310 to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Couldn't the rolls put marks on one side of the strip if only the upper or lower roller was damaged ?
Pillar of the Community
colonialjohn's Avatar
United States
1757 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2019  07:43 am  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add colonialjohn to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
I have an 1817 Mexican War of Independence Re-strike coin with this same effect. Looks like on my example a lamination band but the interior of the band has these raised lines under a stereo microscope review at 40X. Could be a die defect which then this area was then polished creating this effect? In your case these is no discrete bands? but just raised lines from an improper polished die? Remembering an incuse area of the die will CREATE a raised line on the coin. I know Mike Diamond had no identifying mint error definition for this on his Yahoo Channel ... I have been following this outcome.

John Lorenzo
United States
Moderator
Learn More...
SPP-Ottawa's Avatar
Canada
10458 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2019  11:10 am  Show Profile   Check SPP-Ottawa's eBay Listings Bookmark this reply Add SPP-Ottawa to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
Mike Diamond suggested that the planchet was badly scratched, before the strike...

Personally, I think the planchet was flawed, because there are minor laminations if you look close enough...
"Discovery follows discovery, each both raising and answering questions, each ending a long search, and each providing the new instruments for a new search." -- J. Robert Oppenheimer

Content of this post is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses...0/deed.en_US

My eBay store
Pillar of the Community
Learn More...
Canada
5588 Posts
 Posted 03/16/2019  12:19 pm  Show Profile   Bookmark this reply Add okiecoiner to your friends list Get a Link to this Reply
When going through the "what ifs", I thought that either the belt or the roller stopped ... one moving and one not as the strip went though, scratching one surface as it moved along. Every planchet cut from that strip or strips would have one side scratched or damaged. I'm just guessing/pondering.
  Previous TopicReplies: 6 / Views: 1,569Next Topic  

To participate in the forum you must log in or register.



    




Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited.
Contact Us  |  Advertise Here  |  Privacy Policy / Terms of Use

Coin Community Forum © 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Forums
It took 0.29 seconds to rattle this change. Forums