Quote:
Any AU coin with a DMPL designation would be really rare. If you have or can get a picture of it would be really cool to see it.
I have a Morgan that I think would qualify for PL. It's an 1880 in AU58. The fields are highly reflective and mirror-like.




Link to TrueView™
http://images.PCGS.com/TrueView/84324040Quote:
Is PL an impaired proof? Not sure where PL fits in?
KK
Quote:
So PL is one step up from MS?...MS what? Ridiculous!
KK
Allow me to show you a good example of the difference and why it matters to me and many others. I present a pair of 2019 P&D
Kennedy half dollars. The Philly issue is a typical, MS business strike. The Denver is a different animal altogether. It looks markedly different. The coin is super brilliant with a glossy finish, like liquid metal. The PL Denver issues for 2019 remind me of the SMS coins of the late 1960s Special Mint sets. I LOVE the liquid metal look of those "hybrid" coins. Check out the difference:

Here they are under the Canon. The PL Denver KHD was tricky to light. It's so darn reflective that I had to use 3 layers of diffusion to tone down the brightness. Even then, it still had that glow effect that I'm particularly fond of. With my non-axial lighting setup, PL coins always turn out dark with white highlights. Even TrueViews for PL 2019-Ds are very dark.


Here's the link for the TrueView image of my 2019-D PCGS MS67+PL. Love this coin. It's the plate image on CoinFacts too- nice!
https://www.PCGS.com/coinfacts/coin...pl/704876/67
Edited by Darth Morgan
06/30/2019 7:55 pm