Kushanshah:
Thanks so much for your reply! It is very informative as to how such a process can occur. Now when I say, "When is a fouree not a fouree in history" here is how I see it: You just can't see a coin looking anything like this in the Republic era and say that is not a fouree denarius. That whole 50% composition is not an issue. So as I go through coins in life and come across these, is there an emperor in which you can start considering the competing way this much of a bronze showing can occur? Like an Augustus denarius you don't consider this etc. Is there an emperor in which there is a cutoff and Rome was changing the composition so much we do see coins like this that are not fouree? Thanks!
Thanks so much for your reply! It is very informative as to how such a process can occur. Now when I say, "When is a fouree not a fouree in history" here is how I see it: You just can't see a coin looking anything like this in the Republic era and say that is not a fouree denarius. That whole 50% composition is not an issue. So as I go through coins in life and come across these, is there an emperor in which you can start considering the competing way this much of a bronze showing can occur? Like an Augustus denarius you don't consider this etc. Is there an emperor in which there is a cutoff and Rome was changing the composition so much we do see coins like this that are not fouree? Thanks!

























