| Author |
Replies: 14 / Views: 3,646 |
|
|
New Member
United States
10 Posts |
|
|
|
|
Moderator
 United States
34428 Posts |
The rim and surface texture indicate to me that this quarter spent some time in an acid bath.
"If you climb a good tree, you get a push." -----Ghanaian proverb
"The danger we all now face is distinguishing between what is authentic and what is performed." -----King Adz
|
|
Pillar of the Community
 United States
4618 Posts |
 It's under weight because the acid ate part of the copper.
ANA ID: 3203813 - CONECA ID: N-5637 Clean a coin that may be worth collecting? Please DON'T! When in doubt, leave it dirty!! 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
 United States
12477 Posts |
 Either an acid bath or time buried in acidic soil. That's why the edge looks so weird. The copper core is eaten away faster than the cupronickel cladding.
In Memory of Crazyb0 12-26-1951 to 7-27-2020 In Memory of Tootallious 3-31-1964 to 4-15-2020 In Memory of T-BOP 10-12-1949 to 1-19-2024
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
I recently found 1974 Washington quarter that weighs 5.0 g also!!! So all these people who think they have all the answers are WRONG!! Instead of the possibility of it being anything special - the members on here do nothing but talk smack!? Condescending, narcissistic, and just plain rude! I just found my 1974 Quarter today - so it's not an acid bath or chemical damage! Mine looks silver!!! Good eye Hunter
|
|
New Member
United States
2 Posts |
I found this on the web - it's odd how an "acid bath" can strip exactly the same amount from two different 1974 Washington quarters? As described on the NGC label, this quarter was inadvertently struck on a planchet intended for a five cent piece (5.0 grams, solid copper nickel), instead of the normal three clad layer quarter planchet, which weighs a heavier 5.67 grams. That is why you can see that it is a little smaller in diameter, and the edge does not show a copper core like a regular quarter does. 
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
1658 Posts |
The responses of an acid bath for the original coin in this thread were absolutely correct. It is totally different from the slabbed example you show struck on a nickel planchet. The coin posted clearly has a normal but eroded copper core, so it is struck on a quarter planchet as it should be, a nickel planchet would not have this. Yours may or may not be struck on a nickel planchet, you can post pictures including pictures of the edge for ID.
|
|
Moderator
 United States
189502 Posts |
 to the Community, Bathie!
|
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
can hunter send a picture showing size comparison with a regular quarter?
|
|
Pillar of the Community
United States
3475 Posts |
Quote: can hunter send a picture showing size comparison with a regular quarter? hunter's post is over 3 years old, he hasn't been around since 10/15/2019.
|
|
Valued Member
United States
292 Posts |
I see so a few people just replied to an old post. no worries!
|
|
Pillar of the Community
Canada
6244 Posts |
@ Bathie: Quote: So all these people who think they have all the answers are WRONG!! If you do not believe just send for certification and the you will see the result. Please do no confound the apples' with oranges. This coin it is the result of acid without any doubt.
|
|
Forum Dad
 United States
24175 Posts |
Quote: So all these people who think they have all the answers are WRONG!! Quote: That is why you can see that it is a little smaller in diameter, and the edge does not show a copper core like a regular quarter does. You can clearly see the copper in the edge picture on the OPs coin. So who's being Condescending, narcissistic, and just plain rude now? 
|
|
Bedrock of the Community
United States
62064 Posts |
|
|
Moderator
 United States
97685 Posts |
Quote:I found this on the web - it's odd how an "acid bath" can strip exactly the same amount from two different 1974 Washington quarters? The coin in the NGC slab CLEARLY stated "struck on 5C" - meaning it was struck on a 5 Cent planchet. the original coin above shows a copper core, so it cannot be a nickel planchet. Quote:I recently found 1974 Washington quarter that weighs 5.0 g also!!! So all these people who think they have all the answers are WRONG!! Instead of the possibility of it being anything special - the members on here do nothing but talk smack!? Condescending, narcissistic, and just plain rude! So the folks on the original QUARTER was correct!. So you had to go back almost 5 years, just to pick a fight?!!? Who is RUDE now? You are Bathie, you are. Day one you are here first post, you go looking for a fight. Not going to make many friends and allies this way.
Edited by Dearborn 02/22/2023 6:13 pm
|
| |
Replies: 14 / Views: 3,646 |
|