There isn't a single ding or tick on this coin I can find, the PCGS ms68+ has similar pitting on the upper neck, and it has better details in some areas than the pr69 1917 on PCGS coinfacts.
Not sure how it wont make ms68 or higher...considering the ms68+ on PCGS has a ding straight west of the nostril and has lesser striking.
Maybe I'm missing something about grading, I don't have the experience, not trying to be combative, this is why I ask, trying to study and educate myself.
The tail seems even better struck than the pf69 even. I just want to know what puts the grade where it is...
Strike minus flaws...and. Not sure where this coin could possibly improve...unless the grader is into pretty oxidation on a coin, or toning rather.

Not sure how it wont make ms68 or higher...considering the ms68+ on PCGS has a ding straight west of the nostril and has lesser striking.
Maybe I'm missing something about grading, I don't have the experience, not trying to be combative, this is why I ask, trying to study and educate myself.
The tail seems even better struck than the pf69 even. I just want to know what puts the grade where it is...
Strike minus flaws...and. Not sure where this coin could possibly improve...unless the grader is into pretty oxidation on a coin, or toning rather.








































