Even for the date and how these cents were minted, it looks thick. I compared it to several different 1964 D LMCs and none look this thick, especially the IN GOD WE TRUST.
Technically it is die wear. The devices are walking there way to the rim. On DDD ( Die Deterioration doubling, the fields are affected, the devices are not. Both are die wear, But because of the this coin is a multi hubbed die, it is die wear. On the single squeeze dies we see DDD on the fields and not on the devices. Die wear: Note how the devices are afftected? DDD: Note how the fields are affected and not the devices?
Disclaimer: While a tremendous amount of effort goes into ensuring the accuracy of the information contained in this site, Coin Community assumes no liability for errors. Copyright 2005 - 2026 Coin Community Family- all rights reserved worldwide. Use of any images or content on this website without prior written permission of Coin Community or the original lender is strictly prohibited. Contact Us | Advertise Here | Privacy Policy / Terms of Use