1967 1 Cent Doubled Die Obverse

That's the one!
This is the known doubled die, if you search this forum you'll find it has been posted at least a couple of times.

Here's an image of a 1974 double die 10ct. It shows the E in Regina identical to your pic of your E on the penny. When I look for these double dies the first place I look is the base of the E and look for the fork. Its a given if its there.

So I had some free time today and decided to document this coin the best I could and figured I should share it with you guys, I could be wrong about some things and they could be Machine Doubling but since most of this is a real doubled die obverse I just assumed some parts were probably doubled as well.

Let me know what you guys think and thank you for the replies.

If you click on the photo to enlarge it they scale up pretty well and show details a lot better.

Im curious about that as well, I noticed some of the doubling was very obvious and than in some spots not so much and could be over looked as MD.

okiecoiner, most of what is seen on this coin can easily be seen with a loupe, my pictures with the microscope up close are only used to get a good clean photo of areas in question. To my understanding US coin doubling and Canadian coin Doubling are determined differently, that is not my personal opinion, that is just what I have been told and came to realize just recently. Maybe SPP-Ottawa will chime in eventually as he was one of the original posters regarding the 1967 doubled die and I'm pretty sure he wrote about it at one point. I am simply here to learn and I'm just going by what I am reading from this forum and what others have told me.

Alan, I could be wrong but I think the features on the underlying legend are all pushed out the same distance, the only reason it looks like some parts are pushed out further than others is because these parts are the "thinnest" of the legend. If you notice on the obverse of the normal coin shown on the right of my pictures all the lettering is super thin, but the ones on the left that are doubled and look really thick, so I think it could pass as maybe an illusion thinking they are spread out differently on some devices when in reality they are all equally spread just showing more intensely on the thinner letters. Again I could totally be wrong an there could be a more logical explanation, but that is just my theory.

So to clarify you guys are saying that this coin is not a doubled die?

Yet it is identical to the one SPP-Ottawa writes about and claims is a doubled die a long with a lot of other people on here, you can see his post here with pictures http://goccf.com/t/302977 you will have to scroll down a bit but he shows the exact same doubling.. It is obvious this coin has some machine doubling/die deterioration but that doesn't always mean it is not a doubled die as well.